Two Muslim religious leaders removed from flight because pilot refused to fly with them
440 replies, posted
i posted it for the citation by FEMA, not the rest. hope that was clear
[QUOTE=Mattk50;29715234]i posted it for the citation by FEMA, not the rest. hope that was clear[/QUOTE]
No that's not clear because the analysis supports the mainstream view of what happened. Would you like to actually deal with any contradictory evidence, such as the site i've linked you or the very article you linked, or would you just like to continue denying them?
e: that number again is [url]http://www.debunking911.com/[/url]
was reading it already, why do you assume i have to respond to an entire website of information instantly when you refuse to even read my wall o text up the page.
[QUOTE=Mattk50;29715284]was reading it already, why do you assume i have to respond to an entire website of information instantly when you refuse to even read my wall o text up the page.[/QUOTE]
Your wall of text is literally the same exact thing i've read a dozen times before, on this site and elsewhere, except often phrased better. There's no new information in there, it's restated ideas that have already been debunked. And I don't assume you'd respond, i'd assume you'd acknowledge it's existence and also the contradictory info in your previous source that you just kind of ignored.
e: Here just to appease you I picked out some small bit:
[quote]building 7 did not get hit by a plane, how did it collapse at nearly free fall speed so neatly? fires? from what, no plane hit it!??!
[/quote]
Building seven collapsed from the extensive structural damage caused by the pieces of the collapsing towers smashing in to it, in addition to the resulting fires compromising the structural integrity. It's collapse has been extensively modeled as part of the official report.
e: you know it's kind of funny how rating every single post that disagrees with you as dumb actually makes you look like the dumb one
Mattk50, read this thread:
[url]http://www.facepunch.com/threads/1000984-What-Happened-to-WTC-Building-7-on-9-11[/url]
Everything in that turd pile you call a post has been dealt with. I'm by far not the first to debunk the conspiracy theory; it's been dead and buried for over half a decade, yet morons still stumble across old conspiracy theory websites, hit ctrl-c - ctrl-v, and blight this dear little forum with it's nonsense.
[editline]9th May 2011[/editline]
For further reading:
The actual NIST report on the collapse of 1, 2 and 7. [url]http://wtc.nist.gov/NCSTAR1/[/url]
Read this fucking site. Read it. [url]www.debunking911.com[/url]
This site has a specific forum section for the discussion of conspiracy theories, especially the 9/11 conspiracy theory. Feel free to ask them questions, when their site is back up. They also have a section with a collection of material refuting the conspiracy theory: [url]http://forums.randi.org/forumindex.php[/url]
[editline]9th May 2011[/editline]
[url]http://www.debunking911.com/thermite.htm[/url]
This is particularly important; it explains exactly how those columns were so neatly cut, namely during the salvage operation. It has pictures, too!
So wait, do all threads involving muslims and planes devolve into 9/11 conspiracy threads?
who gives a flying fuck
no pun intended :v:
[QUOTE=Uncle_Earl;29674620]Kind of dumb, you know. After all the fuss with muslims why go dressed on a plane in full muslim garb? you don't see catholic priests flying in their robes, eh?[/QUOTE]
The pope always gets of planes and makes out with the ground in his robes.
[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;29715025]as a man you're much more likely to molest a child so i hope you're ok with me not letting you into public parks
[editline]9th May 2011[/editline]
you just linked to an article which uses 911 conspiracy sites as it's citations. nice try[/QUOTE]
Oh you. Is that from personal experience?
[QUOTE=Mr.Thorn;29719228]Oh you. Is that from personal experience?[/QUOTE]
He took it to hyperbole to point out how ridiculous your line of thinking was. Don't be an idiot.
[QUOTE=Mattk50;29715060]its really sad, i spent all that time writing that up, then you buffons dont even read it.[/QUOTE]
What's really sad is that you spent all that time writing that up.
People who straight out deny conspiracies are just as stupid as conspirators.
[QUOTE=johan_sm;29721023]People who straight out deny conspiracies are just as stupid as conspirators.[/QUOTE]
What if there is heaps of evidence against the conspiracy?
[QUOTE=Lizard Of Guilt;29721077]What if there is heaps of evidence against the conspiracy?[/QUOTE]
then it's not straight-out denial
[QUOTE=johan_sm;29721023]People who straight out deny conspiracies are just as stupid as conspirators.[/QUOTE]All you've done so far is whine about people denying conspiracy theories. I've provided reams of evidence against the 9/11 conspiracy theory. How about you similarly contribute, hmm?
[QUOTE=Sgt Doom;29721181]All you've done so far is whine about people denying conspiracy theories. I've provided reams of evidence against the 9/11 conspiracy theory. How about you similarly contribute, hmm?[/QUOTE]
Whine? I made one comment about conspiracies. It wasn't me who posted that 911 wall
Things that shouldn't be allowed near other things based on this sort of logic:
1. Catholic Priests near children
2. Any and all men near women
3. White people near blacks
4. Poor people near anything expensive
[QUOTE=Treybuchet;29721353]Things that shouldn't be allowed near other things based on this sort of logic:
1. Catholic Priests near children
2. Any and all men near women
3. White people near blacks
4. Poor people near anything expensive[/QUOTE]
Everything except 2 right.
[QUOTE=CabooseRvB;29699583]Good luck trying to implement De-Religiousation programs to an overwhelmingly religious world population today.
[editline]8th May 2011[/editline]
You silly minority.[/QUOTE]
Actually we're getting close to the majority in most countries, hell, atheists are in the majority in scandinavian countries.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.