[QUOTE=Zero-Point;52831123]Right? I see all sorts of posts that suggest that they honestly want to believe that the person being charged is Clinton. :rolleyes:[/QUOTE]
I believe they were talking about Reddit.
[QUOTE=BlindSniper17;52831182]I believe they were talking about Reddit.[/QUOTE]
I'm talking about Facebook.
Y'know, where most people get their fake news.
Trump has gone on a nice little Twitter rant about Clinton, seems like the poor guy needs to let off steam for some reason
[media]https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/924641278947622913[/media]
"DO SOMETHING WAHHHH"
Uh hey, aren't you the [I]President?[/I] Why don't [I]you[/I] try and do something, if you're so upset? :weeb:
Boss baby in chief
If this whole thing ends up with trump and his shit friends behind bars I will be a happy man.
I will write trump every day. I'll send him a letter every single day to keep him with something to do.
[QUOTE=Bob The Knob;52833767]Trump has gone on a nice little Twitter rant about Clinton, seems like the poor guy needs to let off steam for some reason
[URL="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/924641278947622913"]Loading Tweet...
[/URL][URL]https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/924641278947622913[/URL]
[/QUOTE]
[media]
Forgot part 1-3
[media]https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/924635359480303616[/media]
[media]https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/924637600094326784[/media]
[media]https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/924639422066384896[/media]
How long until Trump is just publically defacating on pictures of Hillary to distract the public
The degenerate-in-chief would remain in denial even as the hangman's noose tightens around his neck.
[QUOTE=Marcolade;52833779]"DO SOMETHING WAHHHH"
Uh hey, aren't you the [I]President?[/I] Why don't [I]you[/I] try and do something, if you're so upset? :weeb:[/QUOTE]
Wasn't appointing a special prosecutor for Clinton something he campaigned on? Doesn't he have the power to do this as President, and, if not, can't he urge the Justice Department, which is under his wing as head of the Executive Branch? So it's not like there's [I]nothing[/I] he can do if he seriously wants to go after Clinton.
And then, when he realized he actually DID have this power, he'd pussy out, [url=http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/22/politics/conway-no-clinton-charges-donald-trump/]and wouldn't you know, he's already done that.[/url]
[QUOTE=Glaber;52833882][media]
Forgot part 1-3
[media]https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/924635359480303616[/media]
[media]https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/924637600094326784[/media]
[media]https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/924639422066384896[/media][/QUOTE]
Trump trying really hard with the "BUT HILLARY" distraction.
[QUOTE=Omnyx;52833938]Wasn't appointing a special prosecutor for Clinton something he campaigned on? Doesn't he have the power to do this as President, and, if not, can't he urge the Justice Department, which is under his wing as head of the Executive Branch? So it's not like there's [I]nothing[/I] he can do if he seriously wants to go after Clinton.
And then, when he realized he actually DID have this power, he'd pussy out, [url=http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/22/politics/conway-no-clinton-charges-donald-trump/]and wouldn't you know, he's already done that.[/url][/QUOTE]
Oh that's right "we don't care anymore" unless we need a distraction.
The fact that Trump has spent nearly every day of his presidency in a state of paranoid meltdown is what gets me out of bed every morning.
Chris Christie' s been defending the investigation and Mueller, and knowing that he was one of Trump's first GOP allies is absolutely delicious
[QUOTE=BelatedGamer;52833977]The fact that Trump has spent nearly every day of his presidency in a state of paranoid meltdown is what gets me out of bed every morning.[/QUOTE]
and yet, when ever he's on screen he doesn't look paranoid at all.
[QUOTE=Omnyx;52833938]Wasn't appointing a special prosecutor for Clinton something he campaigned on? Doesn't he have the power to do this as President, and, if not, can't he urge the Justice Department, which is under his wing as head of the Executive Branch? So it's not like there's [I]nothing[/I] he can do if he seriously wants to go after Clinton.
And then, when he realized he actually DID have this power, he'd pussy out, [url=http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/22/politics/conway-no-clinton-charges-donald-trump/]and wouldn't you know, he's already done that.[/url][/QUOTE]
I've wondered the same thing. What's stopping Trumps DoJ from investigating Clinton and Uranium One? And why is he complaining that Comey was too easy on Clinton when the reason he fired him was because he was too hard?
[QUOTE=Glaber;52834005]and yet, when ever he's on screen he doesn't look paranoid at all.[/QUOTE]
you can look paranoid?
He's had years of experience in public speaking. Yet he still fucks up.
[QUOTE=Glaber;52834005]and yet, when ever he's on screen he doesn't look paranoid at all.[/QUOTE]
How does a man on screen look when he's paranoid? You don't have to be some blubbering emotional wreck to be deeply paranoid. His tweets have him lashing out and attacking everyone, including his own party.
He attacks anyone who aren't 110% on-board with him.
[QUOTE=ThatSwordGuy;52833915]How long until Trump is just publically defacating on pictures of Hillary to distract the public[/QUOTE]
Well he could carry out his threat to stand in the middle of times square and shoot someone, that'd get everybody's attention.
[QUOTE=Quark:;52829611]Any official confirmation on the identity of the soon-to-be defendant?[/QUOTE]
Wasn't there a story a few weeks ago about Manafort being notified of a coming indictment? I would bet it's Manafort.
[QUOTE=srobins;52834272]Wasn't there a story a few weeks ago about Manafort being notified of a coming indictment? I would bet it's Manafort.[/QUOTE]
It's Manafort or Flynn.
[QUOTE=Lambeth;52834331]It's Manafort or Flynn.[/QUOTE]
Or both.
[QUOTE=Raidyr;52834008]I've wondered the same thing. What's stopping Trumps DoJ from investigating Clinton and Uranium One? And why is he complaining that Comey was too easy on Clinton when the reason he fired him was because he was too hard?[/QUOTE]
He only pulled that one out of his ass because he thought firing Comey (who was seen as somewhat unfair in some liberal circles after that letter leaked) would appeal to liberals.
But to nobody's surprise, he was wrong, and people saw right through it.
Actually, word has it it might be Kushner of all people, which is really damn surprising for the first round of indictments - especially considering the rumors it might lead to arrest, even.
[media]https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/924348693490405376[/media]
[media]https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/924360503291412480[/media]
[media]https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/924448194108551168[/media]
[QUOTE=Zero-Point;52834656]He only pulled that one out of his ass because he thought firing Comey (who was seen as somewhat unfair in some liberal circles after that letter leaked) would appeal to liberals.
But to nobody's surprise, he was wrong, and people saw right through it.[/QUOTE]
Didn't he also pull that out of his ass? He fired Comey for not pledging his loyalty, and made up "you should be thanking me!" as a shallow excuse. I doubt he ever thought that liberals would forgive him, it's just a talking point for his administration and supporters.
[QUOTE=BlindSniper17;52834683]Actually, word has it it might be Kushner of all people, which is really damn surprising for the first round of indictments - especially considering the rumors it might lead to arrest, even.
[media]https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/924348693490405376[/media]
[media]https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/924360503291412480[/media]
[media]https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/924448194108551168[/media][/QUOTE]
I doubt that Keith Olbermann, the leftist version of Alex Jones, and even less of a class act than the humble water filter seller, is a trustworthy source. Olbermann is a ranting manchild in a basement. At least Jones has a studio for his rants.
My guess about the indictment is, that it is going to be someone rather out of the left field. It's not someone who was looked at from the start. Getting the feeling too that it is someone media-related, some of the more vocal mainstream media outlets have been awfully quiet about this news. But hey, we'll see in 24 hours.
This week is going to [I]start[/i] with Mueller's first indictment. I wonder where the fuck we will be by Friday
[QUOTE=Jordax;52834897]I doubt that Keith Olbermann, the leftist version of Alex Jones, and even less of a class act than the humble water filter seller, is a trustworthy source. Olbermann is a ranting manchild in a basement. At least Jones has a studio for his rants.
My guess about the indictment is, that it is going to be someone rather out of the left field. It's not someone who was looked at from the start. Getting the feeling too that it is someone media-related, some of the more vocal mainstream media outlets have been awfully quiet about this news. But hey, we'll see in 24 hours.[/QUOTE]
Ah yes the reputable Alex Jones who spreads conspiracy theories about gay frogs.
[QUOTE=Jordax;52834897]I doubt that Keith Olbermann, the leftist version of Alex Jones, and even less of a class act than the humble water filter seller, is a trustworthy source. Olbermann is a ranting manchild in a basement. At least Jones has a studio for his rants.[/QUOTE]
Keith Olbermann is a bad primary source and not terribly that great of a person either but he really isn't the "leftist version of Alex Jones". The former is a bombastic pundit who takes real news and twists it and sensationalizes it to push an agenda while shouting a lot. The latter has forged a career out of fabrication and fraud. His entire persona fuels and is fueled by disinformation, misinformation, conspiracy theories, and outright falsehoods. The he also shouts a lot and is a bit of a character in no way makes the two men similar.
[QUOTE=Jordax;52834897]My guess about the indictment is, that it is going to be someone rather out of the left field. It's not someone who was looked at from the start. Getting the feeling too that it is someone media-related, some of the more vocal mainstream media outlets have been awfully quiet about this news. But hey, we'll see in 24 hours.[/QUOTE]
CNN was the outlet who broke it and I'm pretty sure they are the poster child of mainstream media. Every other big outlet has covered it except Fox, which really activates the almonds. I'm not even sure who in the media would be facing charges in this case.
[QUOTE=Bob The Knob;52834931]This week is going to [I]start[/i] with Mueller's first indictment. I wonder where the fuck we will be by Friday[/QUOTE]
Apparently some far-left groups wanted to start shit on the fourth. So perhaps, they decided to hold the ''Scream at the skies in pure rage over Trump'' day a few days earlier than first planned.
[QUOTE=TurtleeyFP;52834694]Didn't he also pull that out of his ass? He fired Comey for not pledging his loyalty, and made up "you should be thanking me!" as a shallow excuse. I doubt he ever thought that liberals would forgive him, it's just a talking point for his administration and supporters.[/QUOTE]
To be fair, Comey was really high on the shitlist for most liberals after the election, as they believed that Clinton's (for them unexpected) loss was partially due to Comey reopening the investigation into Clinton a few weeks before the election. Somehow, almost all that hostility and the claims of Comey being a glory hound mainly concerned for his own career, faded as soon he was fired. They then suddenly pretended that they didn't sling all kinds of shit at them beforehand, and that they always stood behind Comey's decisions.
[QUOTE=Lambeth;52834956]Ah yes the reputable Alex Jones who spreads conspiracy theories about gay frogs.[/QUOTE]
Like Keith Olbermann's rants are any better than ''REEEEE FUCK DRUMPH DID A THING''. Truly, the pinnacle of political commentary and comedy. If I'd wanted a directionless thirteen-a-dozen rant about Trump, I would go to r/politics.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.