Rosenstein to make 'a law enforcement announcement'
99 replies, posted
In a thread about Trump's Justice Department identifying the hackers as Russian operatives you say "some Russian hackers with nothing better to do". Just how stupid do you think we are? Honest questions my ass.
"See, no collusion!" says increasingly nervous straight white man for the 10th time this year
Okay, so you didn't answer the question for yourself eh?
Yes, you made a toxx for it, are you actually going to internalize any of that?
Here's a timeline for you:
Trump makes a statement on live international news asking Russia to "do something" about that info.
The russians, within hours, "Do something" about it.
You say "WELL THAT'S NOT PROOF OF ANYTHING IF OBAMA DID THAT I WOULDN'T THINK THAT'S WEIRD"
Yes, you would, and Fox news would call for his head right away.
What I called out is a reason, fucking obviously.
Speaking of collusion, Wikileaks is featured in the indictment as "Organization 1"
The Conspirators also used the Guccifer 2.0 persona to release additional stolen documents through a website maintained by an organization ("Organization 1"), that had previously posted documents stolen from U.S. persons, entities, and the U.S. government.
On or about June 22, 2016, Organization 1 sent a private message to Guccifer 2.0 to "send any new material [stolen from the DNC] here for us to review and it will have a much higher impact than what you are doing." On or about July 6, 2016, Organization 1 added, "if you have anything hillary related we want it in the next tweo [sic] days prefable [sic] because the DNC [Democratic National Convention] is approaching and she will solidify bernie supporters behind her after." The Conspirators responded, "ok... i see." Organization 1 explained, "we think trump has only a 25% chance of winning against hillary... so conflict between bernie and hillary is interesting."
Would have been bad enough if Assange had just lied but he had to go a step further and create a disgusting conspiracy theory about Seth Rich that the MAGA movement pushes to this day.
They won't. That doesn't in any way make it 'not impeachable' or 'not a reason'.
Trump could drop kick a five year old in Times Square on live television and the Republicans wouldn't impeach him if his approval rating remained above 35%.
uh what the fuck are you talking about guy?
Trump outwardly asked the Russians to involve themselves in his campaign and you ARE brushing that off as not collusion
Hey dude, you can't ignore reality and cherry pick it this hard and expect ANYONE to give a fuck what you have to say.
It's clear as day that you're saying "2+2=7 BECAUSE I SAID SO"
This is the entirety of your argument so far.
No, it's the difference between manslaughter and murder, he either A. Was talking out his ass and Russians went with, or B. Was intentionally working with Russians to undermine the election.
Walking people backwards to explain what collusion is doesn't matter because as soon as 100% undeniable evidence is shown proving that Trump himself personally asked Russia to help his campaign by kneecapping Clinton's the discussion will move to how we can't trust that evidence because it's tainted by a biased FBI or some such other nonsense.
No, you misunderstand.
Both are up to Congress.
So you, as a person, a right wing leaning person, are completely, and utterly okay with situation A having factually occurred? It did. That happened, the motivation is up to debate, but the ACTION happened and you're going "ah yeah that's fine".
The reason, I ask about "What would you think if Obama did this" is because Obama had a two week long run of being in Fox News shit books for eating Dijon Mustard. He was accused of being unamerican for EATING DIJON MUSTARD. You do not feel that it is, perhaps even slightly out of order and out of character for the super conservative leaning network to be totally okay with inviting a russian cyber invasion as a casual conversation piece? Do you not feel that you, as a red blooded gun loving american wouldn't be saying "FUCKING OBAMA" if he did that?
You would be, Because fox news would tell you to, and just like we can see here, you fail to question a single iota of the narrative because it would hurt you to do so.
So it's just a bizarre coincidence right? Like the bizarre coincidence that Donald "I absolutely did not collude with Russia" Trump has surrounded himself by people who have colluded with Russia?
Everything is just a bizzare one in a billion coincidence not worth another moment on.
But Hilary, Bengazi, Obama, Comet pizza, I Guarun-fucking-tee you, are worth their time, and billions of dollars to investigate.
Give credit where it's due though this is the first time I've seen Ralgoman carry on a conversation instead of dropping a spectacularly misinformed post that everyone laughs at and never coming back. Few more threads like these and he might get a clue.
What's stopping Trump from giving himself a pardon and getting away like Nixon?
It would be Pence who gives the pardon, absolutely nothing except cause the US to turn away from the GOP for one presidential term.
Still, Pence or anyone after could simply just give him a pardon and he'll get away with it right?
I always find the whole pardon system for presidents in US kinda flawed.
Political suicide is the term. Imagine the ad campaigns from opponents, if he does that.
Do I really need to explain to you that one will lead to his impeachment (collusion), and the other (no collusion) will not?
Given this situation yes, I am. Let me explain why. She clearly was trying to cover her tracks when she had the 33,000 emails deleted, conveniently before she was subpoenad. That would lead me, and half of the country, to believe that maybe just maybe she was trying to hide something. And half of the country rallied behind Trump because they wanted to know what they believed she was hiding. Given that context it makes sense for Trump to make some outlandish claim like, "hey Russia, plz hack state USA so we can throw crooked Hillary in prison".
Did Hillary delete the emails to protect herself? I don't know, you don't know, nobody fucking knows.
Was Trump actively working with Russia to actually get those emails? I don't know, you don't know, nobody fucking knows.
That's why I say I will accept the results of the investigation because that will be the most credible source, not CNN, not Fox, the fucking FBI.
And for the record I don't watch fox news regularly, I get my news mostly from Reddit. (Not r/the_donald)
And I already know someone's gonna say it, yes he lost the popular vote so it's actually a little less than half the country, smartass.
Reddit is just about constantly up in arms about Tinyhands' connection with Russia and literally not a single day goes by where a PoppinKREAM comment chain isn't featured on r/bestof, r/goodlongposts, and gets voted to the top of just about every news article about Tinyhands and the Republican party
I'm not buying it
Not even a little less than half.
55% of Americans cast a vote at all.
Of that 55%, 46.4% cast a vote for Trump.
That means 25.52% of America voted for Trump. So a quarter of America rallied behind Trump. A little less than half couldn't be rallied round either Trump or Clinton.
Fucking hell, I say I will accept the results of the investigation, "no you won't". I say I don't watch fox news. "Yes you do". Believe me or not, argue my points, don't waste time calling me a liar.
Pssssst guess what, real legal professionals don't give a fuck about your uneducated opinion.
Real legal professionals care about things like intent, conspiracy, consciousness of guilt, acts of furtherance, i.e. real-life legal benchmarks that were created for the specific purpose of determining criminal guilt beyond sheer guesswork. In the face of our legal system, your shitposts are worthless.
the GOP is beyond compromised
Moderate republicans and the Freedom Caucus haven't seen eye to eye as of late, so this effort might go down in flames.
A little less than half of voters. Happy?
Do you not share my uneducated opinion that Trump will likely be impeached if he was found colluding? And that he likely will not be impeached unless he does and or did something else besides colluding?
If you still haven't looked up your local demonstration grounds, I urge you to do so now. The impeachment of Rosenstein should automatically trigger nationwide protest.
https://act.moveon.org/event/mueller-firing-rapid-response-events/search/
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
