U.S. Treasury moves to protect identities of 'dark money' political donors
64 replies, posted
Yes, that information was "hacked" by Russia from their own country right? (Let's just ignore the fact that they didn't actually have the information.)
The Crown prosecutor of Russia[a]
met with his father Aras this morning and in their meeting offered to
provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information
that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be
very useful to your father.
Trump Jr. TOTALLY had reason to believe that this had anything to do with information illegally phished from the DNC.
She did not say "let's discuss what you can do for us for us to give you this information". The pretense of the meeting was that an acquaintance of the Trump family by way of the Miss Universe pageant was offering them a favor by referring someone to him who claimed to have some kind of information on Hillary. They had no reason to believe that this meeting would just be a front for any kind of negotiation, and once it turned out that it was, they simply didn't have any of it.
ignoring the fact that George Papadopolous was again, only convicted of lying under oath, and was entrapped by a Russian informant for the FBI. All of this is still not enough for you to just brazenly state that Donald Trump is guilty of treason. Just wait for the evidence to vindicate you if you're so confident that you're right, then I won't be able to say anything.
This is ridiculous, Trump has been banging the NATO drums and is pushing for other countries to support it more. In case you didn't know, the original purpose of NATO was to stand against Russia, and it still is opposed to Russia in a very real capacity. That alone makes it the exact opposite of "plainly obvious".
That's literally what it says, yes. Good you agree.
Wow, even your defence of this sounds extremely shady and unconvincing.
How do you accept his actions and not consider them to be shady? How do you know they didn't have any of it? Because Trump Jr said so? He also said clearly he was doing it for the dirt. How do you know which lie to believe in?
He was not entrapped. What so ever. Do you even know what entrapment is?
You've already said in this very thread you wouldn't accept whatever they say, because it's only "Proven" because you're calling into doubt the validity of the investigation. That in and of itself is a joke.
He spent 3 days trashing NATO, and lying about it. Yet here you are saying "LOOK WHAT A CHAMPION OF NATO HE IS". Literally no one thinks this except for you.
trump could shoot BFGX's dog right in front of him and then afterwards say "no I didn't" and BFGX would just go "oh okay then"
he's the kinda guy who sees the cult leader having sex with children and believes him when he says he was just "performing a ritual to expel the evil from their bodies"
You might be bothered by this but because of it this thread has become a pretty good collection of sources regarding the Trump FBI investigation so I really appreciate the opportunity to read up on it
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.