Oh nooo, England is only 85% white nowadays what a travesty! Indian and Pakistani people, the common antagonists among British white nationalists, make up a whopping 2.6%, and 2.1% of the population respectively, whatever are white people going to do now that they are virtually a minority
Witcher was a documentary, Poland is 80% human, 20% elves and magical creatures.
I've never understood people who are concerned about people of their own skin color making up a smaller percentage of a country's population. It's the most illogical, nonsensical bullshit imaginable. Shouldn't one be more worried about shifting cultural norms than skin color?
i don't know how to put this my dude, but like, the brownies aren't turning white people brown just by being near them.
your fantasy idea of "Polandistan" would not happen within a hundred lifetimes, if it would happen at all.
Damn, I hope you find videos that explain that flat earth is real and immediately believe them.
This guys about page says "Christian Traditionalist and Nationalist fighting for cultural revival"
A+ Source dude nice job
You know what. You're right. People here want to dismiss the "low birth rates" thing out of hand because it sounds like poorly researched swill, but you're absolutely fucking right that low birth rates are a problem. Granted they're only a problem due to the fact that their people were murdered whole sale by the government, but pssssh that stuff happened like, 100 years ago. Sure there's also the problem of native children getting placed with non native foster parents that was perpetuated by the government. But now it's low birth rates that's causing them to have a declining population...
Caused by the government systematically sterilizing native women. About 1/3rd of women are thought to have been sterilized in native tribes, but some numbers put it as high as 50%
This shit was going on in the fucking 70s and is being felt now. That was not due to some natural process. It was due to racist ass government officials enacting racist ass policies. You know, like the ones in the not too distant past that sterilized black people at a disproportionate rate in the name of eugenics.
This is the path that an obsession with race brings.
This thread wasnt a mistake after all. Its already funnier than lmao pics.
I'm pretty sure this thread was made as a joke but it's still sad to see it slide into identity politics so quickly.
I'm from the US where centuries of racist sentiment and literal policy made sure that minority groups stayed together and away from majority whites. Check out this map of Chicago.
http://www.radicalcartography.net/chicagodots_race_big.jpg
This is mainly the remnant of racist housing policies that made it incredibly difficult for minorities to disperse themselves among the majority populace, combined with white people literally moving to escape the minorities moving into their neighborhoods. These minority groups have been in the US practically as long as their white counterparts.
But please, feel free to explain to me about how its about some lack of an ability to "assimilate" and not the result of a culture of fear pushing them into insular groups.
Because the USA has a history of immigration? Do you think those same arguments have never been made here before? What makes the UK fundamentally different?
Sure there can be benefits to Diversity. Different mindsets of people, skills, etc... None of this goes away if we were just a mixed race.
but I don’t even think there needs to be a mixed race, just that you shouldn’t care if there are less whites because of natural movements.
There will always be diversity amongst people... Tall, Short, Intelligent, Focused, Creative, the list goes on. So yeah your argument is weak and garbage.
I legit feel sorry for moderate "righty" folks, having to put up with this sorta thing.
An user of old punch, flash Marsh, sent me this. https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/coming-conservative-dark-age/ it's a Conservative saddened that right wing narrative is so polluted by racists and alt right types.
How are they paying for it.
Also, let me guess: the majority of your friends are white. Who pays for that?
There's nothing wrong with homophily itself, it's natural. That doesn't necessarily mean integration failed.
And how do we know these sourceless numbers (that one can only assume is pulled from your arse) aren't the product of the tories being in power?
"Okay guys fuck off with the memes. This is now a serious thread about conservatism."
*topic immediately shifts to white genocide*
What does this have to do with immigration? i can sense you're really beating around the bush here.
this is why diversity is good imo
having black people or muslims in your workplace will make it very clear they aren't out to get you.
Here's one of my favourite pro-Second Amendment articles, or to be more precise, anti-anti-Second Amendment rants. Seeing exactly what it would entail to abolish the Second Amendment must be sobering reading for those advocating it.
There's also a good article by Jonah Goldberg where he discusses the need to take a stand against the cranks. I am glad these articles get posted because hopefully someone like kulka can read them and realise that there is far more sense on NR and Commentary than some ditzy blonde parading around Europe questioning where all the white folk are at.
One thing that gives me hope is the good conservatives are now quick to go after the loons. They are getting results, too, this insane proposal got deleted after it was laughed at from all angles:
https://twitter.com/HashtagGriswold/status/1042080252162437120
A lot of acid attacks are by whites and whilst it may be more common in some communities there are plenty of issues that are almost Anglo exclusive (*cough* hooliganism and drunk brawling *cough*). Theres also the majority of people that are innocent of such behaviour that you are throwing under the bus here. We live in a civil society, we are supposed to work to eliminate problems, and if you think people, by virtue of ethnicity or nationality, are the problem then you need to re-evaluate your ideas.
And how many of those attacks are against people not of their own ethnicity? I'd wager that the vast majority of them probably are which makes this tangent entirely irrelevant to whatever point you've been trying to make since they're clearly not endangering white people.
Nothing in that article links back to your original point about race or immigration. In fact, it's mostly about how gang members have been using easily-obtainable corrosive cleaning fluids to attack people they are robbing.
"A CNN report last year cited experts and social workers in that part of the capital as saying the problem was linked to austerity and the lack of opportunity for boys and young men from poorer households."
So did you just make the assumption that someone who attacks someone with an acid must be brown or something? It's a hell of a leap.
So what about the parts of your map with lots of immmigrants but fewer acid attacks, like the western part? Doesn't really seem to correlate that well.
Well if it's only happening against nonwhites and I'm white, why should I be worried exactly? And how is that relevant to whites being in danger?
You're not doing a very good job of actually arguing your points here at all. You're laying out a bunch of largely tangential and barely relevant points then whenever anyone explains why those points are invalid you just repeat the process, slowly getting further and further away from your original point rather than realizing your error and correcting it.
Ah, so you don't even have the self-awareness to realize I'm using your own argument against you. You've been arguing about how whites need high birth rates because our majorities are shrinking. So obviously it only matters if you're white, according to your own arguments. So according to your own arguments there is no reason for me to be worried if nonwhites are attacking other nonwhites. Do you get it now or is it still somehow not obvious enough for you?
Looks like he ducked out by nuking himself and breaking the thread. Nice.
https://puu.sh/BAUm4/205fd6e126.png
The globalists got him too, he knew too much
I'm not right-wing (though I am pro-2A) but there's plenty of valid reasons really.
One of the most common reasons in the US to own a gun is for hunting which is actually a lot more important for people in rural areas than most people seem to realize. If not for hunting a lot of those people wouldn't be able to make ends meet at all.
There's of course self-defense which is completely valid in high crime areas. While relying on the police is a better idea when possible, sometimes that's simply not possible and it's better to be able to actually defend yourself and your loved ones if your lives are in danger.
There's also simple sport shooting (target practice, skeet shooting, etc.) which may not seem explicitly necessary by any means but the way I view it is this: There's tons of hobbies in this world that are totally unnecessary. I play D&D with my friends, for example. That doesn't serve any real purpose other than spending time doing something I enjoy. The same is true for people who shoot for sport.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.