• Christine Ford/Brett Kavanaugh Senate testimony live thread
    999 replies, posted
No? We're treating the allegations and unproven but corroborated and credible, made further corroborated and credible by the fact that Kavanaugh has repeatedly lied and perjured himself on this matter. Put up or shut up. If you have exculpatory evidence that would convince a judge, present it now.
Do you not think perjury is a serious crime?
It's a felony in most US states. Putting a felon on the Supreme Court to own the libs.
I find it really frustrating that you waltzed in here and complained about people not caring about facts, while you littered that same post with falsehoods. And when confronted with multiple posts showing you exactly how those are lies, you pretend that those particular posts don't exist. That's incredibly dishonest.
Oh I know. I'm just curious if Hermy thinks so or not.
If Kavenaugh committed perjury, he should be prosecuted. If we can prove he assaulted ford, he should be prosecuted. Simple.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyAWUqIgIrM I told you to present exculpatory evidence, not meekly squeak back in here going 'well, maybe he should be prosecuted i guess'. I'm disappointed in you, hermy.
I just disagree that he committed perjury in the way you describe. Kavenaugh never said that Ford's friend didn't believe her. He simply stated "She said it never happened". Which, according to her recollections, is true.
This is a lie. You have no credibility. He directly stated, and I quote: And you know, yeah, and it’s been investigated and all four witnesses say it didn’t happen.
That's not how that works, but good try. "refuted" simply means that one bit of evidence is cancelled out by other evidence. It doesn't have to be a direct accusation of falsehood.
Asking for evidence and then ignoring it when presented, great poster.
Now respond to the other part of that quote: And you know, yeah, and it’s been investigated and all four witnesses say it didn’t happen.
It wasn't canceled out. Therefore, it was not refuted. Are you really going to sit here and tell us 'how things work' when you repeatedly prove that you, yourself, have no idea 'how things work'?
You know what would be really great? I would love to talk to all of you on discord. It seems this isn't going to well for me, as I can't give each of you the attention you so desperately desire from me. Or teamspeak works. As much as I enjoy thrusting myself into forums filled with left-wing ideologues, I'm finding it difficult to keep up with demand. Would anyone like to volunteer a server to chat on?
As a person who dealt with similar shit, her testimony hit home hard. Idk what the fuck can make you think "Oh she's just faking it."
Normally when you make accusations without evidence in a debate forum things won't tend to go well for you, no. What exactly did you think was going to happen? You would waltz in here and demand evidence and then laugh as nobody presented any? You know what would be actually really great? If you stopped posting or if you posted actual evidence that proves anything that you're posting has any merit to the discussion.
You know what, fuck off with that. I don't fucking care what you experienced, just like you don't care what I've experienced.
But I thought you were on shitty airport wifi with a shitty laptop? And now you're offering to voice chat? Something isn't adding up. The Empathy of the Right, everyone.
Honestly at this point its easier to just assume that hermybepimpn is trolling and ignore anything that he contributes to this thread.
Nor do you care about facts. Or truth. So why are you here, in Polidicks, again?
But it's up to the accuser to provide evidence, and all of the evidence that Kavenaugh actually committed the assault is NON-EXISTENT, and these accusations of perjury are weak, at best.
He basically outright admitted to it with his comment on wanting to "fuck shit up".
That's not how evidence works; it won't be how evidence works no matter how much you'd like it to work the way you'd like it to. There's the door, feel free to leave.
How are you going to lump in a stranger's "experiences" with "fact" or "truth"? Just because I don't care about your bitching daddy diddling you, suddenly I don't care about "fact"? That's because all of you put the words of the accuser on the level of truth.
you can stop now, thanks
Interesting variation on the Trump supporter strategy. You're supposed to quietly crawl back into the shadows when pressed to answer counter arguments, not directly admit that you're having difficulties.
Yeah don't do that.
John Roberts has a choice, does he want him and his court to be remembered as the worst in American history, worse then fucking Taney, for betraying the United States and being complicit in the takeover of the last resort of democracy.
https://66.media.tumblr.com/122a311268c4eda3b8f3574578ef9b08/tumblr_inline_pfqaelqpR51w8hhh5_540.gif How i feel right now after reading this. No anger, no rage, no spite. Just pure disappointment. The fact this country has elected idiots that hold batshit insane and backward ass views, such as yourself, has completely sunken in at this point. This is country has absolutely gone to shit. There might be some hope in fixing it, but good fucking lord this comment has clouded over whatever sign of hope that exists.
God I'm sick of this sealioning bullcrap from the right.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.