• Ten people were contacted in the FBI Kavanaugh investigation
    40 replies, posted
So a judge, a god damn judge, swears a vendetta on the democrats after lying under oath repeatedly, and this is your best defence of him you need to learn to read bud
No senator please come back! I need to hear more sane, direct, and well spoken answers to questions! Please!
One word: perjury.
Since the other thread was locked @Saxon the hearings on that case will be heard the day Kav is confirmed unless they reschedule, we don't know how the justices will rule also, whether Kav will affect it or not.
It's pretty obvious that the FBI investigation was never intended to be anything but cover for vulnerable senators but it's still disappointing to see "moderate Republicans" give in again.
Did Ikkah get nuked? anyone complaining about the court of public opinion need to realize that Kavanaugh isn't under trial, neither criminal nor civil
So the FBI interviewed everyone who were supposedly first hand witnesses of the places in question and, in their own words: "there is no corroboration of the allegations made by Dr. Ford or Ms. Ramirez." (Supplemental FBI Investigation Executive Summary)
https://www.wsj.com/articles/white-house-finds-no-corroboration-of-sexual-misconduct-allegations-against-kavanaugh-in-fbi-report-1538625927 Are you talking about this? I mean, if you were, that's the White House saying that they didn't find anything. The Supplemental Background Investigation confirms what the Senate Judiciary Committee concluded after its investigation: there is no corroboration of the allegations made by Dr. Ford or Ms. Ramirez," the Judiciary Committee Republicans wrote. And if you're talking about this then that's the Judiciary Comittee Republicans saying that. You know, the guys that kept being very loud, obstructive and asked questions such as "Do you believe in God?" and "Have you been through hell?" during the hearing. Both sources are not exactly credible. Obviously, if the Democrats said that didn't find anything - would I believe them? Honestly, I would be more inclided to, however they aren't exactly unbiased either. Therefore I would love to hear it from a more independent source.
Looks like it. Neat.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.