• Trump warns antifa: Opposition to you could be tougher and ‘much more violent’
    129 replies, posted
and pipe bombs and mass shootings and just straight up murders while antifa has... spraypainted someone's driveway
If you think the alt-right ideology hasn't gained significant spotlight and momentum in the last few years, your face is probably in the monitor because of how short-sighted you are.
https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/232726/b78c66c5-d1ee-46a9-b42e-31fdb7c9ef48/image.png Are we really doing this again
Literally "It can't happen here." https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/133737/f87982dd-5b42-46a9-83df-acd0b8051b5a/image.png
[cough] InfoWars and PizzaGate[cough] https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/03/26/521545788/conspiracy-theorist-alex-jones-apologizes-for-promoting-pizzagate Are you over looking the Charlottesville Rally where neo nazis killed an american citizen on american soil in 2018?
Wow https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/October_2018_United_States_mail_bombing_attempts#Suspect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlottesville_car_attack https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pittsburgh_synagogue_shooting Also the alt-right is extremely dangerous. You're so dishonest.
>>>/4chan/. Also, who's alt are you? To quo-queue: sources. Reliable ones. Is it still a funny joke when the people taking 'the jokes' seriously are the ones who're telling others 'don't take the jokes seriously'?
I'm sorry but who just shot up a synagogue and killed 11 Jews? You think believing Jews need to die because they control the world and are going to wipe out white people is ok? I don't even care if this is obvious bait anymore, choke on my fat nuts.
...and to add onto that: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/03/magazine/FBI-charlottesville-white-nationalism-far-right.html
No. But it helps.
You really don't get it, do you? Antifa is rectionary. It exists only because of the modern resurgence of facist / nazi ideology. It's unorganized. Of course it's going to be chaotic. Large groups of angry people tend to be unstable. That's just how it is.
Your defense was 'but there are jews in his family. jews can't be nazis' as if that were any sort of defense. People with physical deformities and who were not white still joined the nazi party, thinking they would be spared because 'they were the good citizens'. They were not. People are capable of a wide range of self-delusions in order to whet their need for frantic security at all costs. Trump isn't a Jew. Trump doesn't stand by anything -- he has stated so on the record. Trump only worships one thing: Himself.
I wonder which permabanned poster you're an alt of.
can we just get an admin in here and get rid of this shit so we don't have to go for another 5 pages telling him to fuck off. thanks
Probably one that finds alt-right talking points and speeches and so forth things which are 'just interesting' to ponder.
Oh gee I'm experiencing deja vu right now. Who else said this exact thing a few weeks back?
Half of America participated in that election. Trump lost by millions in the popular vote. Of the half which voted in America, less than half voted for Trump. You are arguing that 25~% of America was able to elect a President we all hate. That is accurate. He is doing a damn fine job of convincing the other 50% of America that was eligible to vote to show up this time around.
I'll just say it I don't like fascism but if the alternative are masked mobsters commiting vandalism, arson and battery then what they call fascism looks better by the minute. Haven't heard about a big Antifa attack in a while though. What brought this on?
Yes, because vandalism, arson, and batter are fine alternatives to mass-genocide, moral-lawlessness, and a mass abandonment of ethics and consideration of your fellow man as another, equal, individual who deserves the same rights as you.
Has there ever ben a "big" antifa attack?
oh are we at the "doomed to repeat it" stage already?
https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--I2R_tTyg--/c_scale,f_auto,fl_progressive,q_80,w_800/183ob861iy0ckjpg.jpg
Again? Yes. If the election process was purely a popularity contest based on numbers rather then states then trump would have lost. But when both sides were campaigning, they weren't campaigning for numbers, they were campaigning for states. If it was purely a popular vote, both sides would have then campaigned differently. Here's an analogy. We're playing basketball right? And you happen to shoot more points. Good game, yeah? But then I come along and say "Nah hah hah! My net was actually on the other side of the field so you lost, loser!" The states that made Trump win were fly-over states that the democrat party wrote off as "hicks who don't matter".
Here's another analogy. You are stating that 'the team that yelled the loudest won'. The stadium was half-full and half of the half-full stadium was yelling loudly. Of that half of the half-full stadium, maybe half were truly convinced the game should be awarded to Team Blue rather than Team Red where the other half just wanted Team Red to lose - regardless of the fact that Team Blue was Team Red's opposition. This may very well make the stadium very full the next time we have a game. Of that half of a half of a half - you are expecting that those voices should be considered 'a silent majority'? If not, then you must admit that those states will be awarded to whoever Trump is not so long as Hillary is not running - which it is looking to be very unlikely.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.