• Trump is going to decide whether to call national emergency in the next few days
    44 replies, posted
Don't buy into his rhetoric. By saysing "deciding whether " he is suggesting that it is even possible. According to Trump lawyers working out details of using national emergency to.. IT IS NOT! This is his rhetoric!
Yes. But doing it when there isn't actually a national emergency, to circumvent congress? He's going to get fucked. Unfortunately the Senate is still GOP controlled and for two years they've shown they don't give a fuck as long as they get what they want from whatever it is
I think gorsuch will vote against this too, he seems to follow closer to thomas
or maybe stand for something and not be fucking spineless
Maybe I've just seen too many movies, but could there be ulterior motives and implications for a state of emergency? What exactly do emergency powers entail, and how else can they be abused outside of going around congressional approval for this ridiculous project of his? Would this give him the ability to declare martial law, silence press, etc to solidify power?
What Can a President Do During a State of Emergency? the National Emergencies Act doesn’t require that the powers invoked relate to the nature of the emergency. Even if the crisis at hand is, say, a nationwide crop blight, the president may activate the law that allows the secretary of transportation to requisition any privately owned vessel at sea. during a declared war or national emergency, the president can unilaterally suspend the law that bars government testing of biological and chemical agents on unwitting human subjects. In 1942, Congress amended Section 706 of the Communications Act of 1934 to allow the president to shut down or take control of “any facility or station for wire communication” upon his proclamation “that there exists a state or threat of war involving the United States,”
so that's what he's going to do with all of those camps on the border! use them to test Zyklon-B chemical weapons!
What the ever loving fuck is that for
I'd assume/hope it's some roll-over thing from when we used bio/chem weapons, and our local laws prevented military from using it on enemies, since I suppose those would be "unwitting subjects".
Laws are only intended to be some level of morality and order enforced. If laws are wrong, on some level. Then they should not be obeyed and should be changed. Part of me hopes that if Trump calls a national emergency then, despite the fact that it's totally legal, the American people just say "No." Though I imagine that's stretching it beyond the moon, considering it would require a level of organisation completely unseen in politics. The emergency services, military and general politicians would probably be the most important factors in this, right?
Immigrants are not zoo animals. Walls don't stop humans.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1082347305699889157 OH BOY HERE WE GO, CAN'T WAIT FOR ALL THE LYING AND MISINFORMATION https://twitter.com/JuddLegum/status/1082349006460764160 https://twitter.com/benwikler/status/1082350363670441986
Belgium didn't fall over a budget. It also wasn't at the whims of a child.
What do you think? The CIA and MoD had a fucking field day from the 40's through 80's treating your citizens like lab rats in the most insane reach for scientific edge in populace control and warfare that can be close enough in competition to wave at the Nazi's from a short distance.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.