• Mississippi bill would protect teachers who don't respect transgender students
    38 replies, posted
We really don't need to. I don't think there is a way to explain to an unwilling participant that "hey, you're just objectively incorrect" about this, if they refuse to be self aware. You refuse. So we are at an impasse. The impasse is you refuse to learn, or acknowledge that the knowledge you have now, is incomplete.
Indeed. Some people would call this a slippery slope argument, but it fucking ain't, because the bible was used to justify SLAVERY via a bullshit interpretation of the "sons of Ham" in Genesis being black people.
How can you be "objectively" correct about something that is subjective? Are you saying that laws are exact and not up to interpretation?
There's no interpreting the text of the law as written into the mangled distortion you are presenting the law to be, that's why you're wrong and that's why everyone is telling you you're wrong. The law explicitly says that it does not allow what you are saying it will allow. You're factually wrong about what the law text says. This has been explained to you several times and your response has been variations of "no u."
The entire point of law is to be objective and not subjective.
The law also say that the superintend may suspend someone that is a threat general welfare of the students. In that case, someone wouldn't be suspended for misgendering.
deliberately misgendering somebody to hurt them, especially considering how mentally vulnerable trans people can be, is fucking bullshit and you know it. There's no way this bill should be allowed to pass.
Sometimes people don't misgender to hurt.
That was implied with the deliberate part. Remember the clown who refused to accept there were more than two genders because of muh religion? he got sacked for being a piece of crap as it was justly deserved, since he deliberately used the birth gender to speak to the student and refused to listen to their requests that they be gendered properly multiple times. He could've just done this with no issue but he did it because of "his sincere beliefs". Here's the thing: your "sincere beliefs" emphasize tolerance in the new testament, not blindly accusing your brothers of sins when they havent done anything to hurt you.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.