• Here's What US Lobbyists Want Donald Trump To Get From A Post-Brexit Trade Deal
    43 replies, posted
The Tory party has been working for a long time on changing their healthcare to the U.S system, hasn't it? I remember them negotiating the export of our "medical industry" to the UK. It just seems like this is the latest milestone in that goal
Quite the indictment to say that Labour couldn't convince their own voter base to support Ref2. If JCo & Co aren't capable of presenting the case for Ref2 then I doubt they'd have much success as a government. This notion that right-wing extremism would increase as a result is farcical as well. Non-right wingers who are supportive of Brexit aren't going to become ethno-nationalists overnight (because Brexit ideology isn't all based on xenophobia). It's not like we're in the midst of a general election campaign either, so what would right-wing extremism, on the occasion that there would be an increase, amount to? Your own source says that Labour supporters of Ref2 were considering their party membership over him not supporting it. If his own party members are going to revolt against him then he's a shit leader, who is: incapable of presenting a legally implementable alternative to TMay's withdrawal agreement that would be acceptable to his party - his five demands or the previous six tests aren't policy, they're an unactionable wishlist; and unable to present a viable case, based on the continually mounting evidence of job losses, companies relocating premises or staff, and foreign leaders highlighting the UK's future diplomatic position, that staying in the EU would be the better alternative to Labour members. He's a terrible Opposition leader. In the wake of the incompetencies displayed by the government, Labour should be hammering the Tories. They've been totally ineffective and its entirely down to the nebulous policy direction JCo has taken them down. Further to that, he isn't proposing we stay in the Customs Union, he's proposing we form "a customs union" with the EU. Your own source and the letter itself says as much. A permanent and comprehensive UK-wide customs union. Same as his proposition for Close alignment with the Single Market. So in other words he's proposing we stay tied to EU institutions while revoking our capability of being an influencer over them. Further to that, any sort of divergence by the UK over time is going to cost businesses more money as they'll have to manufacture goods or offer services that align with two sets of regulations. Either that, or we'll have to enter negotiations to establish mutual recognition agreements, as well as establish institutions that will facilitate that regulatory alignment in the UK (more money). This is just political spin by JCo. Dynamic alignment on rights and protections so that UK standards keep pace with evolving standards across Europe as a minimum, allowing the UK to lead the way. More spin. He's asking for alignment while not being a member of the EU's institutions. In other words, we'll endure the ensuing economic hardship of leaving the Single Market and the obstacles that will create, plus having to pay for the establishment of our own institutions to facilitate this policy. So either Corbyn is woefully incompetent and in turn being grossly irresponsible, or he's being disingenuous and therefore complicit in the facilitation of a no-deal Brexit. I'd expect the man to have more intelligence than the former, so I have to go with the latter.
US politics has been thoroughly corrupted by greed, ever since we legalized bribery (in the form of unlimited anonymous campaign donations), the rich have had unfettered access to any politician they want, and in some cases are even allowed to write our legislation.
hoyl shit no
Can't wait for the Brenter referendum next year. It's gonna be lit.
US Lobbyists should be gunned down in DC like the rabid wolves they are.
https://fitnessreloaded.com/pus-in-milk/
Can we put these on a bus instead of that NHS funding lie? Thanks.
I googled it too, I also found some websites saying none and some websites saying there is pus in there. Just giving one account is misleading no?
If US lobbyists are trying to get rid of reglementations against it, it probably means that there is unless you bring your chain of production up to standards.
Allow politicians, not courts, to handle legal disputes This would literally be life-changing, like...on an unprecedented scale. Separation of powers in the UK would be shot in the face, and the constitution would most likely collapse.
Coming from a dairy town, and someone who's worked in and around dairy facilities, finding pus in your milk is the least of your concerns.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.