• Brexit Party: Pensioner covered in milkshake outside polling station.
    30 replies, posted
The conspiracy is a bit weird as it's some nobody on Twitter going full CSI agent and accusing this man of covering himself in yogurt / milkshake, then denouncing him because the old boy wasn't sure if it was yogurt or not, lol. That mspaint picture is incredibly desperate, it was a false-flag because there was no yogurt on his shoes and he had a half eaten sandwich? What? Be rational. Are you some kind of Tescos-Finest yogurt tossing expert? Do you study yogurt / milkshake splatters at crime scenes? The man said the assailant gave him the finger for sitting outside the polling station, walked into the coop next door, then came back and chucked what he thought might have been milkshake and ran off. Personally I believe the more rational story of people picking up on the trend of tossing food at politicians they don't like over a old man dousing himself in a undetermined yogurt / milkshake substance (pending review) to get some, what exactly? Quick votes on polling day? He was assigned to sit outside the polling station for the day until 10pm to record the number of people who voted. As for this N. Ireland business, I found this: Brexit Party army veteran, 81, in milkshake row 'was acquitted o.. The then-Sergeant Donald Ernest MacNaughton was charged with attempted murder and causing grievous bodily harm with intent to do grievous bodily harm over the incident, which occurred while he was in charge of an army patrol in "a hostile area" following an explosion. The patrol met a local man coming from the direction of the explosion and, suspecting him of being implicated, arrested him under the Special Powers Act. Sergeant MacNaughton alleged that the unarmed man was shot while attempting to escape, while the man claimed he was ordered by MacNaughton to climb over a fence to the flank of the patrol and was shot by him when he did so. MacNaughton – who was in his mid-30s at the time – was found not guilty of both charges by the Belfast City Commission on September 5, 1974. The judge ruled that the evidence of the civilian was "unsatisfactory and inconsistent in certain details", whereas the evidence of the accused and other soldiers "fitted together and was not mutually contradictory". He also found that the prosecution had failed to eliminate "the reasonable possibility" that MacNaughton's action was "reasonable in the cirumstances", given "the nature of the terrain and terrorist activity in the area" of Armagh at the time.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.