Weapons should do more damage

[buttslap]

[QUOTE=Tools;49727247]So you want everyone to tryhard the very second server's got a wipe? Is that your defence against new people?
Good job mate, if you can't headshot people or the likes then dips on you. Guns are already plenty powerful, they don't need more damage.[/QUOTE]
I think most people can agree on the fact that gun-dmg vs unarmored ppl is just fine.
It's about the dmg ppl recieve when fully armored.. ppl walk on while they should've dropped.

[kiansmith]

I don't mind guns being more powerful as long as they are harder to acquire, easy to break and unrepairable. There is too much emphasis on high tech weaponry and not enough on melee weapons or bows.

[Sneak2]

[QUOTE=Zipper Bear;49715400]Devil's advocate: I think weapons should do less damage. Might encourage more pvp if the majority of the server didn't get dominated by a handful of snipers in towers.[/QUOTE]

Scopes are turning Rust are turning into a domination sniper game very quickly

[[Jake]]

damage should be rng

[Int3nseGrind]

If guns were stronger and armour less effective, wouldn't people just pray and spray more often? Hoping to get a headshot. Seems like fights would end a lot quicker and be less skill based IMO.

[Kev Dog]

[QUOTE=Sneak2;49745687]Scopes are turning Rust are turning into a domination sniper game very quickly[/QUOTE]

Yesterday, I was on a battlefield server. Some1 was in a snipers nest, and I snuck under him. I kept killing him, and he never noticed I was there. Scope has downfalls up close. :pwn:

[Chernobyl.Z]

[QUOTE=Int3nseGrind;49751954]If guns were stronger and armour less effective, wouldn't people just pray and spray more often? Hoping to get a headshot. Seems like fights would end a lot quicker and be less skill based IMO.[/QUOTE]

No it would make it so (hopefully) people would go for a well placed shot and some good vantage points and use more tactics to win. Spraying isnt a thing really with the insane kick in the game.