I think you're a glutton for punishment, whysojaye.
lmao
so after getting vac'd from rust
you make a new account, and continue using the same hack that got you vac'd in the first place
well done 10/10 work
A tip for the future: There are no 100% untraceable hacks. The person who claimed so most likely was fully aware of the shitstorm that would result, which is why they stated to come here to try and appeal it if anyone using got caught and VACC'ed. They know Facepunch can't do anything with regards to VAC bans and told people to do this to keep heat off of themselves.
This is literally a new form of stupidity the likes of which I've never witnessed.
[QUOTE=ATribeCalledQ;43722334]This is literally a new form of stupidity the likes of which I've never witnessed.[/QUOTE]
Oh that can't be true, ever seen American politics, or any politics for that matter?
[QUOTE=LordCrypto;43722321]lmao
so after getting vac'd from rust
you make a new account, and continue using the same hack that got you vac'd in the first place
well done 10/10 work[/QUOTE]
that's ok
that's 40$ for Garry Newman
[IMG]http://i572.photobucket.com/albums/ss166/SebMcMeb123456/SPP3_zps320e1aa2.gif[/IMG]
if in fear contact not me
[QUOTE=J!NX;43722363]that's ok
that's 40$ for Garry Newman
[IMG]http://i572.photobucket.com/albums/ss166/SebMcMeb123456/SPP3_zps320e1aa2.gif[/IMG][/QUOTE]
it will soon be $60
[QUOTE=whysojaye;43722400]it will soon be $60[/QUOTE]
Cool, well, you're just going to be banned again.
[QUOTE=Itrme;43722344]Oh that can't be true, ever seen American politics, or any politics for that matter?[/QUOTE]
lol foreigners telling me about my own country like I don't already know.
snip
Okay, let's not start doxing people. Calm the fuck down and don't witch-hunt. VAC is the executioner, it doesn't need your help.
[QUOTE=trak49;43722449]Here's another account of his:
-profile-[/QUOTE]
Looking for VAC'd alt accounts is a thing, doxing is another.
Snip that before somebody sees you, it's not a cool thing to do.
he also paid for the hack :D
[QUOTE=entenhausen;43722537]he also paid for the hack :D[/QUOTE]
For each account?
Hahahahah get banned more!
[QUOTE=Spectre1406;43722634]For each account?[/QUOTE]
Nah, I think it's just a third-party program that injects code into the executable regardless of which account you're using.
[QUOTE=SteakStyles;43722333]A tip for the future: [B]There are no 100% untraceable hacks.[/B] The person who claimed so most likely was fully aware of the shitstorm that would result, which is why they stated to come here to try and appeal it if anyone using got caught and VACC'ed. They know Facepunch can't do anything with regards to VAC bans and told people to do this to keep heat off of themselves.[/QUOTE]
I'd debate the bolded text.
Theoretically, the best way to prevent VAC bans while hacking would be to have an extremely private hack (aka something self-coded for your own personal use) or to have one that's specially generated to uniquely identify with each user of the hack. (That way the VAC ban wouldn't trigger for all users, but just the one user.) That's just me thinking, though, and I don't have any expertise in this field.
if you dont already know, a lot of cheaters get banned and come post this exact same thread, and someone just exposes their username on a cheat website and we all laugh happily ever after
While being in denial and thinks that we can fix these kinds of stuff.
[QUOTE=Itrme;43722177]This might be why:
[IMG]http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/800x600q90/14/4gdn.png[/IMG]
Funny how you used the same forum name instead of your steam name, took me about 5 more seconds to google..... :P[/QUOTE]
I very highly doubt this was just a lucky coincidence, Don't hack and you wont be banned kiddo.
Read This Thread:
[url]http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1355599&p=43712675[/url]
You've cheated and you can't deny it!
Don't parent teach their offspring honor anymore?
Kid, you played, you lost, end of the game. For your own good, just take it as a lesson if life.
Yup time to move on to a new game you can get banned off :-)
You'd actually think people who want to use hacks in a game have some sort of intelligence somewhere - Y'know, they managed to install a hack that is what it's advertised to be, and not a Trojan backdoor.
But when they go ahead and use the same exact username they use for every other website they register to, it knocks them down to being nothing but a 8 year old child.
I'm very against using hacks, but the sheer stupidity of people disappoint me even more..
[QUOTE=Itrme;43722177]This might be why:
[IMG]http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/800x600q90/14/4gdn.png[/IMG]
Funny how you used the same forum name instead of your steam name, took me about 5 more seconds to google..... :P[/QUOTE]
You gotta love it when they make it so easy.
Ask your pal Haruhi (everyone knows him) for a refund for your hax. Watch him laugh straight in your face, then delete your thread and ban you from the site (to avoid the bad publicity.)
That's what you paid for.
Edit: Also, if you give a cheater a possible reason for why they got banned, i.e. someone said it might be because he was playing at a cafe...they'll adamantly claim that was in fact the reason...as he did here.
If you were like, maybe it was because you changed your toilet paper brand recently...someone would claim that was why they were banned.
[QUOTE=J!NX;43722408]Cool, well, you're just going to be banned again.[/QUOTE]
Don't J1NX it :)
[QUOTE=wauterboi;43722645]I'd debate the bolded text.
Theoretically, the best way to prevent VAC bans while hacking would be to have an extremely private hack (aka something self-coded for your own personal use) or to have one that's specially generated to uniquely identify with each user of the hack. (That way the VAC ban wouldn't trigger for all users, but just the one user.) That's just me thinking, though, and I don't have any expertise in this field.[/QUOTE]
As far as I know you are right. Remember LSS (Lua Source Scripting)? LSS was a plugin for source games that allowed for lua coding. There were bunnyhop scripts, music players, all sorts of shit. The plugin by itself could not get you VAC banned, because source games literally supported plugin loading at the time, just like GMod does.
Toward the end of its life span the developer of the plugin did something pretty controversial, he added a function that let you get player positions. That quickly turned the plugin malicious, and led to aimbots and shit. Ruined LSS in my opinion, I had a lot of fun with it. It's what originally got me interested in Lua.
Around the time the player position function was added, Valve caught on about the plugin loading and disabled it. The LSS community had two ways to get around it. Some of the older members just injected LSS into the game. I never heard about them getting VAC banned, and some of them did it for months. That makes me assume that private cheats are a lot harder to catch.
The not so smart community members used a dll that unblocked the plugin loading again. It took about a month before VAC started banning for it, but it happened eventually. Those who used it for a week or so and then quit who were never VAC banned.
The people who used the plugin re-enabling dll for about a month or two straight were eventually banned after Valve found out about it. It still took at least a month though, so VAC must have never detected it from the start.
TL;DR There have been cases where things really have been undetected at first.
[QUOTE=TheDrunkenOne;43722302]Best part is that he's been VAC'd before. [url=http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198118407995]His previous account is in his friends list. It has been vac banned as well and has been last accessed 3 days ago[/url].[/QUOTE]
I belive that gets you VAC banned on your new account.
[QUOTE=wauterboi;43722645]I'd debate the bolded text.
Theoretically, the best way to prevent VAC bans while hacking would be to have an extremely private hack (aka something self-coded for your own personal use) or to have one that's specially generated to uniquely identify with each user of the hack. (That way the VAC ban wouldn't trigger for all users, but just the one user.) That's just me thinking, though, and I don't have any expertise in this field.[/QUOTE]
This is incorrect. That would only be true if VAC used a definition library, similar to an anti-virus program like Norton. That method is used on anti-virus because a computer could be configured a million different ways, new programs installed etc.. Then you could possibly say "if I fly under the radar, they won't put my hax into their library to search for". But I'm pretty sure with VAC (as opposed to the library method), since what the game code SHOULD be is established already, and static, it's simply looking for ANYTHING that is injected or changed from the "golden standard" they've been given by Devs. So your hax don't have to be "popular" to get banhammered.
The more you know. Hope that helps!
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.