I get banned and i only play for 1 day PLS HELP ME FACE PUNCH ADMIN - Rust

[QUOTE=Andendumwel;48202189]"You got sentenced by a judge/jury to the death penalty."[/QUOTE] I love that neckbeards are now comparing "getting banned from Rust for cheating" to "the death penalty".

[QUOTE=Andendumwel;48211069]And this is a forum. You know? A place to discuss things on.[/QUOTE] Yeah and I'm discussing about how ridiculous it is to compare an anti cheat to government imposed laws and legal system.

[QUOTE=Maximum Over;48212247]**[/QUOTE] Stopped reading your invalid comment at neckbeard. Into the trash your comment goes. [QUOTE=itisjuly;48212273]Yeah and I'm discussing about how ridiculous it is to compare an anti cheat to government imposed laws and legal system.[/QUOTE] What's so ridiculous about it? I can't make equations that sound logical?

[QUOTE=Andendumwel;48212568]Stopped reading your invalid comment at neckbeard. Into the trash your comment goes. What's so ridiculous about it? I can't make equations that sound logical?[/QUOTE] He has to say an insult to belittle you before making his statement in order to have any sustenance.

[QUOTE=Andendumwel;48212568]I can't make equations that sound logical?[/QUOTE] You've got that right. [QUOTE=Chowder;48212586]He has to say an insult to belittle you before making his statement in order to have any sustenance.[/QUOTE] Belittling has nothing to do with it. Comparing being banned from Rust to dying is pretty funny (and frankly sad). It's also a really good indicator that maybe it's time to put the game away and go outside.

[QUOTE=Andendumwel;48202622]Signed, someone who got banned by Evenbalance TWICE in error.[/QUOTE] And what caused these false bans? [url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PunkBuster#False_Positives[/url] "Violation #89265" was caused by a non-cheat program being flagged as a cheat. The system didn't actually fail here. It was given false information from the programmers. The other was an exploit by people intentionally attempting to exploit a security hole. Again, the system didn't fail. It detected what it was supposed to detect. When an anti-cheat has false positives, it will not be limited to a single person. Because of the nature of computers, you would expect to see much higher numbers of people complaining of a false ban.

[QUOTE=utilitron;48213281]And what caused these false bans? [url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PunkBuster#False_Positives[/url] "Violation #89265" was caused by a non-cheat program being flagged as a cheat. The system didn't actually fail here. It was given false information from the programmers. The other was an exploit by people intentionally attempting to exploit a security hole. Again, the system didn't fail. It detected what it was supposed to detect. When an anti-cheat has false positives, it will not be limited to a single person. Because of the nature of computers, you would expect to see much higher numbers of people complaining of a false ban.[/QUOTE] That's Battlefield 4. My false bans were on Battlefield 2 and Bad company 2. Since BF2 PB had at least 30 false banwaves. Multiple banwaves were caused by cheaters exploiting PB. [url]http://evenbalance.com/[/url] Click a game and read the amount of false banwaves or read this [url]http://www.pbbans.com/forums/mbi-news-f424.html[/url] This is where my distrust for anti cheats come from. You can even read the main EACs guys thesis about PB failing. [url]https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/83595/THESISVARAJARVI.pdf?sequence=1[/url] Twice i've been left in the cold while marking you as a cheater.