• Battlefield sequel now in development, coincides with the launch of EA's e-sports division
    48 replies, posted
[url]http://www.pcgamesn.com/battlefield-series/battlefield-sequel-now-in-development-coincides-with-the-launch-of-eas-e-sports-division-0[/url]
120$ for multiplayer only
[QUOTE=kweh;49308189]120$ for multiplayer only[/QUOTE] +60$ Premium Pass. :v:
[QUOTE=Mitsuma;49308208]+60$ Premium Pass. :v:[/QUOTE] Including old maps from previous games rather than new ones
[QUOTE=TheTalon;49308213]Including old maps from previous games rather than new ones[/QUOTE] If you mean old as in BF2 old, then I honestly don't mind as 2 had some great maps
1944 or 2143 or bust
[QUOTE=Citrus705;49308274]If you mean old as in BF2 old, then I honestly don't mind as 2 had some great maps[/QUOTE] Operation Metro 2016
I want a new Plants Versus Zombies
[QUOTE=I am Error;49308357]Operation Metro 2016[/QUOTE] Operation Locker 2.0
Wake Island 2143
[QUOTE=RocketRacer;49308458]Operation Locker 2.0[/QUOTE] Every map is a variation of Wake Island
[QUOTE=Mitsuma;49308208]+60$ Premium Pass. :v:[/QUOTE] Was already counting on that BUT... Since its going into competitive, I guess we can expect the game to last right? Which would mean yes, +$60 for pass no2 somewhere down the line.
[QUOTE=Citrus705;49308274]If you mean old as in BF2 old, then I honestly don't mind as 2 had some great maps[/QUOTE] And one of my favorites is about to be released in BF4 <3 Dragon Valley.
Wasn't the Final Stand expansion hinting at a possible 2142 sequel? Or was that all just fanservice.
please a ww2 battlefield imagine that with the new frostbite engine omg
We need Vietnam. WE NEED FUCKING VIETNAM
[QUOTE=The bird Man;49308449]I want a new Plants Versus Zombies[/QUOTE] An actual Plants vs Zombies as opposed to that garden warfare crap, yeah.
[QUOTE=The bird Man;49308757]We need Vietnam. WE NEED FUCKING VIETNAM[/QUOTE] God I wish we got a Viet Nam game with a singleplayer story on par with Apocalypse Now. But it's hard to be on par with such a fucking masterpiece. Still, even inspirations from that and FMJ would make it amazing.
Battlefield 4 Vietnam when They can clearly pull off the jungle theme
Moving to an e-sports focus implies that there won't be a single player. RIP Bad Company 3? :suicide:
one of the main complaints about battlefuns 3 + 4 were the SP campaings. They were fucking awful and complete wastes of effort, so it's a good sign they're now focused on MP. Battlefront isn't a great bang for your buck becuase of the lack of SP, but because the MP is just eh. If they can repeat what BF2 did, it might be a good battlefield. But "competetive" scene? IIRC the bf4 "competetive" scene is 5vs5 with no vehicles. They're also going to need to work on the netcode, cause BF4s is still nothing to write home about. seems that forced SP is now replaced with forced e-sports. We'll see how it goes, BF4 still has a lot of life in it now that it's developed properly
[QUOTE=Killer900;49308709]Wasn't the Final Stand expansion hinting at a possible 2142 sequel? Or was that all just fanservice.[/QUOTE] snow, hovertanks, blueprints for the walker mechs, I'm going to say it could have been a bit of both. It ties 2142 into the lore with the start of that whole future cold war, but was also dice telling EA "hey look at the hype this generated don't tell us 2143 won't sell" because it's always brought up that 2142 wasn't a 'big success'. the problem now is, they were too early to the future war party and now that CoD is churning all that junk out nonstop a lot of people might be disillusioned and throw around a lot of accusations at EA just trying to ride their coattails on the genre
[QUOTE=dai;49309251]a lot of people might be disillusioned and throw around a lot of accusations at EA just trying to ride their coattails on the genre[/QUOTE] Oh boy will they. There are people playing CoD now that weren't even born when 2142 was released. And even more that wouldn't have known about 2142 since they were still too young to play games back then.
stop making me feel oLD
Battlefield Armageddon [url]http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3355554/[/url]
Well how about you make it different from the last two, without SP (should've included SP in Battlefront though), but ofcourse you won't
[QUOTE=booster;49309527]Battlefield Armageddon [url]http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3355554/[/url][/QUOTE] [quote]This game is about a small town soldier who is in battle for japan. He must fight to get home to his family and friends. [img]http://i.imgur.com/sBZJjYu.png[/img][/quote] hm something tells me that's placeholder trash
After how badly written and buggy BF4's SP was I'm surprised they're even trying again.
EA launching an e-sports campaign is laughable at best. for games to be at least serious and realistic on a competitive level the game needs to remain constant, and have a life longer than a year before it's sequel drops. Therefore you know this isn't going to work with EA's business model.
is BF following the CoD business model now? only its 120$ and you still get only half of the game?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.