[QUOTE=Brt5470;39647611]Manu's aren't allowed to modify the titan. Only the clocks and voltages I beleive.[/QUOTE]
That's my point. They wont mess with the video memory but they will inevitably factory overclock it and pimp it with triple fans.
[QUOTE=Brt5470;39647537]Yea, and what framerate. My dual 580's barely do "Max" at 1080p at about 45-50fps average.[/QUOTE]
I can run them at 35-40 fps which is perfectly playable and it looks exactly like 60 but since I don't use x16 AA x20whatever anisotropic filtering I run most of the games at 45-50 fps.
[img]http://i.imgur.com/0brS74t.png[/img]
A new card that is faster than the previous generation? HOW REVOLUTIONARY.
GAMES CHANGED.
[QUOTE=cdr248;39647222][B]I have a GTX 460 and I can run Metro 2033 and Crysis 3 at the Max settings[/B] but according to everyone else YOU GOTTA HAVE 900000 SUPER POWER EXTRAVAGANZA CARD THAT COST MORE THAN THE GOD DAMN COMPUTER ITSELF.
[editline]19th February 2013[/editline]
Also am I the only one who has never had heating with Nvidia cards?[/QUOTE]
Bullshit, at 800x600 maybe. Metro 2033 is a bitch to run on ultra.
Max settings means: every setting turned up to the highest (bar AA but it still should be set to >=2x msaa) at 1080p @60fps stable.
[QUOTE=Dwragon82997;39648404][img]http://i.imgur.com/0brS74t.png[/img]
A new card that is faster than the previous generation? HOW REVOLUTIONARY.
GAMES CHANGED.[/QUOTE]
It's one of the first cards to come from a tesla model.
[editline]19th February 2013[/editline]
[QUOTE=borisvdb;39647938]That's my point. They wont mess with the video memory but they will inevitably factory overclock it and pimp it with triple fans.[/QUOTE]
No, I'm saying Manu's can't change the titan at all outside of software. Similar to the 690. You're going to see the same fan, which according to some previews is really really quiet.
in 10 years tablets will have 2 times the rendering performance
[QUOTE=alien_guy;39648429]Bullshit, at 800x600 maybe. Metro 2033 is a bitch to run on ultra.
Max settings means: every setting turned up to the highest (bar AA but it still should be set to >=2x msaa) at 1080p @60fps stable.[/QUOTE]
My screen resolution is 1440x900 but seriously you don't have you have your games at 60 all the time. Pretty much anything above 35 looks exactly the same as 60 frames. I usually set my AA to 2 or 4 depending on the game and have my settings all the way unless the game is horribly unoptimized.
Ok I read some more and watched a video, the clock and voltage change by setting a temperature is pretty fucking neat.
And I guess my idea of max settings is different from yours because I just boost up the most important things. I'd rather have max texture quality than a huge performance hod like max SSAO, which I won't notice all that much.
[QUOTE=cdr248;39648787]And I guess my idea of max settings is different from yours because I just boost up the most important things. I'd rather have max texture quality than a huge performance hod like max SSAO, which I won't notice all that much.[/QUOTE]
You can't say "I can run x on max" when you actually mean "I can run x at a medium resolution with some of the features turned down"
[QUOTE=cdr248;39648787]And I guess my idea of max settings is different from yours because I just boost up the most important things. I'd rather have max texture quality than a huge performance hod like max SSAO, which I won't notice all that much.[/QUOTE]
Max is short for maximum
Aka... maximum.
I never felt the need to upgrade my monitor.
[editline]19th February 2013[/editline]
And considering that Metro doesn't really have many graphical options that you can choose then yeah, I can run it on max.
[QUOTE=Joakim Lindb;39647442][img]http://hardwarebg.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/nvidia_geforce_titan_crysis3.png[/img]
I guess i'll wait another year then.[/QUOTE]
falcon NW has such sexy looking cases, i wish they would sell them. Their prebuilts are uber expensive though.
Future benchmark
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3W4m7EpYUA[/media]
GTX Titan vs Asus Ares II
A titan versus a god.
heh.
[QUOTE=cdr248;39648877]I never felt the need to upgrade my monitor.
[editline]19th February 2013[/editline]
And considering that Metro doesn't really have many graphical options that you can choose then yeah, I can run it on max.[/QUOTE]
"just boost up the most important things/I disable some of the features" =/= "running it on max", no matter how many options it has or how little you disable
My post was pretty dumb but the point I am trying to make is that even with an older graphics card I can run a lot of recent and highly technical games with good settings and good performance so what its the point of buying a super new and expensive card when I could just use cards that are 1 or 2 generations lower than the current.
I'm expecting a mini fire-extinguisher to come in the box. And now we wait for EVGA to come up with some Superclocked version, guaranteed to emit alpha radiation from it's heatsinks.
I don't know whether this card scares me or awes me.
Why are nVidia marketing this as a gaming card?
Its basically a budget version of their Tesla GPGPUs, shouldn't it be marketed as such?
[QUOTE=Lyoko774;39650565]Why are nVidia marketing this as a gaming card?
Its basically a budget version of their Tesla GPGPUs, shouldn't it be marketed as such?[/QUOTE]
It's marketed as exactly what it is. The gaming counterpart of the Tesla GPU's.
It just feels like everyone's getting the wrong idea with it..Sure, its powerful, but its likely that the next generation or two of GPUs from nVidia will blow it out of the water for less money
[QUOTE=Lyoko774;39650673]It just feels like everyone's getting the wrong idea with it..Sure, its powerful, but its likely that the next generation or two of GPUs from nVidia will blow it out of the water for less money[/QUOTE]
790 will definitely be more powerful.
[QUOTE=Kecske;39645628][IMG]http://cdn3.wccftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/GeForce-GTX-Titan_31-635x523.jpg[/IMG]
[sub]look at that SLI bridge[/sub][/QUOTE]
Holy shit that's incredible. Being able to run fully maxed out games such as Crysis2, Hitman Absolution, Crysis3, GTAV with [i]absolute ease[/i] would be quite something. Expensive way of having fun, too.
[QUOTE=GreenDolphin;39645282]The GTX 690 is more powerful while also being cheaper than this. I'm not sure why someone would buy this if you actually consider the price it's going for. This uses a single GPU chip though (unlike the GTX690 which uses 2 on a single PCB) so that's fairly interesting.[/QUOTE]
The 690 is not more powerful, this card scales harder, is more power efficient, is smaller and my god, the compute capability of a workstation gpu.
[QUOTE=Gekkosan;39650743]Holy shit that's incredible. Being able to run fully maxed out games such as Crysis2, Hitman Absolution, Crysis3, GTAV with [i]absolute ease[/i] would be quite something. Expensive way of having fun, too.[/QUOTE]
I'm pretty sure you can max out those games with just one 690, let alone 680 and 670.
[QUOTE=dark_console2;39650804]The 690 is not more powerful, this card scales harder, is more power efficient, is smaller and my god, the compute capability of a workstation gpu.[/QUOTE]
The Titan has more... power in theory, but it's not faster than a 690 in most scenarios that the card is being marketed for, which is gaming.
[QUOTE=Kecske;39645628][IMG]http://cdn3.wccftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/GeForce-GTX-Titan_31-635x523.jpg[/IMG]
[SUB]look at that SLI bridge[/SUB][/QUOTE]
It's like having a minature sun in your computer!
Or alternatively a nuclear bomb... Same principal though.
my MSI 680 PE is less than a week old and Nvidia comes and slaps their cock in my face with this
[QUOTE=GameDev;39651194]my MSI 680 PE is less than a week old and Nvidia comes and slaps their cock in my face with this[/QUOTE]
but you could've just bought a 690 if you wanted to spend twice as much
[QUOTE=Scot;39645071]Now for some rich bastard to quad-SLI it.[/QUOTE]
Nutcases turning their pc's into radiators or fireplaces.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.