Virtual reality: John Carmack's battle for 20 millisecond latency
35 replies, posted
[QUOTE=garry;39700960]This is a good write up.
As someone who bought a 65 inch 3D LED TV for £4000 the sub $1000 price tag doesn't seem so bad. Plus weirdly I'd much rather watch a 3D movie on a headset like this than in front of my TV with the glasses on.
I'm looking forward to getting our dev kit :v:[/QUOTE]
For that price please tell me it was active 3D?. I bought a 55" 3D TV for about a fifth of that as a passive 3D screen.
[QUOTE=RedStar;39701560]a whole new era in sexposes[/QUOTE]
BE the sex pose.
[QUOTE=zeromancer;39704290]BE the sex pose.[/QUOTE]
With that an kinect.
Oh sweet jesus it would be beautiful.
[editline]24th February 2013[/editline]
garry wouldn't be so lonely with it.
[QUOTE=cdr248;39706463]With that an kinect.
Oh sweet jesus it would be beautiful.
[editline]24th February 2013[/editline]
garry wouldn't be so lonely with it.[/QUOTE]
I think we found ourselfs our motto for the VR Kinect Update
"Garry's Mod: Be The Sex Pose"
[QUOTE=garry;39700960][B]As someone who bought a 65 inch 3D LED TV for £4000[/B] the sub $1000 price tag doesn't seem so bad.[/QUOTE]
so that's where my money went, garry :v:
Oh god VR sex poses
I hope this thing isn't going to hurt my eyes. In my older years this seem to happen more often when I look at something up close for an amount of time.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.