Wow! These screenshots of Grand Theft Auto V running at minimum settings will blow you away!
52 replies, posted
[QUOTE=nox;47590615]I actually thought this was WaveRunner 64 for a solid minute.
Just shows how versatile a game it really is.[/QUOTE]
I think driving those and having 3 people try to murder eachother on them is unbelievably fun
and also the most TEDIOUS THING you can do in this game in terms of trying to kill people
[editline]25th April 2015[/editline]
[QUOTE=Dr.C;47600449]Console master race!
have fun spending $3000 every year upgrading a piece of shit that can't even play all the halo games[/QUOTE]
Hahaha, dumbass, everyone knows consoles can't even play at 30 fps, unlike my 5000$ machine, that can run [B]40 [/B]fps on medium
[img]http://i.imgur.com/ky2RkSw.png[/img]
This confuses me.
[QUOTE=Ott;47601793][img]http://i.imgur.com/ky2RkSw.png[/img]
This confuses me.[/QUOTE]
either People are very delusional or different raters
[QUOTE=Ott;47601793][img]http://i.imgur.com/ky2RkSw.png[/img]
This confuses me.[/QUOTE]
people are weird or very delusional
[IMG]http://cdn.pcgamesn.com/sites/default/files/GTA5%202015-04-22%2022-42-58-47.jpg[/IMG]
reminds me of a 2d racing game.
[QUOTE=Sableye;47598883]still looks better than unmodded san andreas, so its progress[/QUOTE]
Wow there are mods for that?
What the hell have I been doing with my life? :D
[QUOTE=General J;47590675]this is weird because somehow it's written snarkily yet GTA V being very well optimized is a good thing[/QUOTE]
It's poking fun at those people who make such a fuss about how high they can crank their settings up when the reality of it is framerate is the only thing that makes a gameplay difference. You do have a point though, your ability to crank settings down is much more important than cranking them up.
[QUOTE=nox;47590615]I actually thought this was WaveRunner 64 for a solid minute.
[QUOTE][img]http://cdn.pcgamesn.com/sites/default/files/GTA5%202015-04-22%2023-11-08-61.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
Just shows how versatile a game it really is.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Megadave;47601886][IMG]http://cdn.pcgamesn.com/sites/default/files/GTA5%202015-04-22%2022-42-58-47.jpg[/IMG]
reminds me of a 2d racing game.[/QUOTE]
If GTA V can be reminiscent to Wave Race 64 AND a higher detail version of an open world Out Run at the same time like this when it's on the lowest settings then I am sufficiently blown away.
When I get this on PC I'm keeping the settings this way forever.
Even though its a joke, consider it a display of how flexible RAGE is, got a potato PC? You can likely run it on all low at 30fps.
[QUOTE=Reagy;47602771]Even though its a joke, consider it a display of how flexible RAGE is, got a potato PC? You can likely run it on all low at 30fps.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, a midrange computer from 2008/2009 can run it.
[QUOTE=Ott;47601793][img]http://i.imgur.com/ky2RkSw.png[/img]
This confuses me.[/QUOTE]
Gold members
[QUOTE=Xron;47603614]Gold members[/QUOTE]
i agree, golds are the worst users
never trust any golds ever
honestly i am kinda shocked at just how low the lowest settings are. with lots of games nowadays you put a game to minimum and it doesn't look much different at all, but this is a complete change from even just all high, which i think is great on Rockstar for letting people with many different rigs play this.
i'm also just a huge fan of putting games on minimum to see the graphics change so this is especially neat for me
so when do we have to shell out to modmakers to make the minimum graphics look better
[QUOTE=kweh;47601889]Wow there are mods for that?
What the hell have I been doing with my life? :D[/QUOTE]
ya while the base GTA san andreas on good graphics still looks good, the engine can handle HD graphics well enough, though modding the game was still not trivial
[QUOTE=DEMONSKUL;47590366]Well it's a shit joke[/QUOTE]
You didn't even have the presence of mind to register it as a joke the first time round
You seriously thought this silly ass absurd article was real
at least the other "well it wasn't funny" posts here didn't out themselves as massive gullible fucks before they said anything.
When it comes to shit like this, the satire is only 50% of the joke with the rest of the laughs being supplied by people like you.
How do people make it look like this? I have all the settings set to lowest(which is medium) and it looks much better than that.
[QUOTE=Levelog;47602787]Yeah, a midrange computer from 2008/2009 can run it.[/QUOTE]
People have been able to play it on tablets with integrated graphics with decent framerates, you could probably even put it on a flashdrive and play it on school or work computers too.
Unless your computer is more than 10 years old, I think you can run it, which is almost ironic as some people with new computers can't even run GTA IV on low settings with anything more than 5 frames per second. It's really almost completely day-and-night.
looks like driver 2
i thought it was funny
[QUOTE=Ott;47601793][img]http://i.imgur.com/ky2RkSw.png[/img]
This confuses me.[/QUOTE]
it's not just a [I]bad[/I] joke, it's a shitty one
I wonder if we can try and balance those out
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.