It's like they took a Lego/Zoids designer and made them draw concept art for Blops 2.
They should have been more creative instead of jacking the art style and concept of BF2142. Could have created mini suits reminiscent of Armored Core or something of the like.
[QUOTE=Jacko245;36119041]*cough*
[img]http://cf.shacknews.com/images/20120502/blackops2reveal_003_21942.nphd.jpg[/img]
Well, if you think that's plausible, I'll let you believe that.[/QUOTE]
others have already pointed this out but yeah bigdog system with guns on it
what isn't plausible about that
as far as legs on a robot go you might think that'd be retarded but so far legs have worked pretty well
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2D71CveQwo[/media]
I don't understand facepunch's aversion to everything call of duty
[img]http://i.ytimg.com/vi/9tvMP4ooluU/0.jpg[/img]
Anyone remember these fellas?
[QUOTE=FullStreak12;36121739]6 year old graphics?
The trailer was most likely 360 footage and it looks much better than a lot of recent games. It also runs at a constant 60 FPS on consoles, which very few games can pull these days.[/QUOTE]
It does not look better than any recent game.
getting shot and magically regenerating after losing approximately 7/8 of your blood is plausible too
i mean anything is plausible in the realm of call of duty
like how every time it's the russians
every single time
russians
[QUOTE=simkas;36122311]It does not look better than any recent game.[/QUOTE]
Fallout 3 and New Vegas
Arma2
Homefront
Despite your membership in the cod hating cool kid club, it does look better than many recent games. Personally I couldn't care any less about graphics in a game as long as it has nice gameplay and story, and Black Ops was a good game that I still play today. Don't get me wrong, it certainly is no GOTY, graphics could be better, but you're overreacting.
[QUOTE=FullStreak12;36122390]Fallout 3 and New Vegas
Arma2
Homefront
Despite your membership in the cod hating cool kid club, it does look better than many recent games. Personally I couldn't care any less about graphics in a game as long as it has nice gameplay and story, and Black Ops was a good game that I still play today. Don't get me wrong, it certainly is no GOTY, graphics could be better, but you're overreacting.[/QUOTE]
Fallout 3, New Vegas and Homefront are not recent games. And ArmA2, despite not being a recent game either, looks miles better.
[editline]29th May 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=SystemGS;36122318]getting shot and magically regenerating after losing approximately 7/8 of your blood is plausible too
i mean anything is plausible in the realm of call of duty
like how every time it's the russians
every single time
russians[/QUOTE]
You're kinda mistaking gameplay mechanics with story. They're 2 completely different things.
And russians aren't really bad guys in this one.
[QUOTE=simkas;36122731]Fallout 3, New Vegas and Homefront are not recent games. And ArmA2, despite not being a recent game either, looks miles better.[/QUOTE]
Homefront and New Vegas both came out in 2010 I think. Fallout 3 was 2008 but New Vegas had nearly no graphical improvement. No clue about when Arma 2 came out but,
[t]http://cdn.steampowered.com/v/gfx/apps/33900/ss_1374ca6f3b346340a11292f7a2c0a0761c356105.1920x1080.jpg?t=1320871583[/t]
It doesn't look terrible and graphics don't make much of an impact on me in a game, but IMO Black Ops looks better.
[QUOTE=FullStreak12;36122801]Homefront and New Vegas both came out in 2010 I think. Fallout 3 was 2008 but New Vegas had nearly no graphical improvement. No clue about when Arma 2 came out but,
[t]http://cdn.steampowered.com/v/gfx/apps/33900/ss_1374ca6f3b346340a11292f7a2c0a0761c356105.1920x1080.jpg?t=1320871583[/t]
It doesn't look terrible and graphics don't make much of an impact on me in a game, but IMO Black Ops looks better.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, 2010, this is 2012 and Black Ops 2 looks just a bit better than they did. And that picture is not taken on high settings.
[QUOTE=FullStreak12;36122390]Fallout 3 and New Vegas
Arma2
Homefront
Despite your membership in the cod hating cool kid club, it does look better than many recent games. Personally I couldn't care any less about graphics in a game as long as it has nice gameplay and story, and Black Ops was a good game that I still play today. Don't get me wrong, it certainly is no GOTY, graphics could be better, but you're overreacting.[/QUOTE]
It's not the "grafics" that bother me. I guess it's the art style I don't like, but that's an opinion.
[QUOTE=simkas;36122832]Yeah, 2010, this is 2012 and Black Ops 2 looks just a bit better than they did. And that picture is not taken on high settings.[/QUOTE]
I got it from the Steam page, no clue about the settings. The Black Ops 2 footage we've seen is a trailer with xbox 360 gameplay.
This is from the MP
[t]http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/594719743142437096/4D49232639C719F883A7608117C5A0B0F1661110/[/t]
SP
[t]http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/595821443396899838/6CBC98634F867D23FEE158DDE83B86B1A5150DCA/[/t]
AA is off, other than that I think I have the game running at full settings.
I'm not trying to say either game is ugly, but when people start screaming that a yearly franchise such as CoD needs a new engine, and looks like a PS2 game, they make themselves look so fucking stupid.
[QUOTE=cccritical;36121915]I don't understand facepunch's aversion to everything call of duty[/QUOTE]
Most of FP is on the CoD hate bandwagon despite the fact that there are several game franchises that are milked just as much if not more than CoD and on much greater scales.
[IMG]https://dl.dropbox.com/u/17610513/ZScreen/2012-05/Screenshot-2012-05-30_00.36.54.jpg[/IMG]
yeah
and this is on a foreground of a cutscene
[QUOTE=Fingers!!!;36119043]
Guys listen
Guys
This is the best idea
Let's grab a tank
and put LEGS
LEGS ON A TANK[/QUOTE]
guys i played this great game called metal gear
and they had this tank with two legs
lets give our tanks...................... FOUR LEGS
because thats the fucking future.
woah hey did it ever occur to anyone that games don't objectively look better than others??
[QUOTE=SystemGS;36122318]getting shot and magically regenerating after losing approximately 7/8 of your blood is plausible too
i mean anything is plausible in the realm of call of duty
like how every time it's the russians
every single time
russians[/QUOTE]
Ultranationalists, who started a war that made "normal" russians attack.
Its the same as real life America's enemies. They are all from the middle east, difference being their groups, maybe their reasons and nationalities.
Calling all of them russians is like saying all terrorists are from Al Qaeda.
[QUOTE=Dierag;36119121]The legs lead me to believe it can either use tracks or walk around, actually nifty for a tank to get over obstacles. I hope that's what will happen at least.[/QUOTE]
Not if you want to pay for maintanance more than what you pay for a b-2 bomber. Those legs are probably a nightmare to deal with.
[QUOTE=SystemGS;36122318]getting shot and magically regenerating after losing approximately 7/8 of your blood is plausible too
i mean anything is plausible in the realm of call of duty
like how every time it's the russians
every single time
russians[/QUOTE]
It's the chinese this time
[QUOTE=Zillamaster55;36123345]It's the chinese this time[/QUOTE]
oh okay so they've finally stepped into the post-cold war world good for them
The 360 footage looks amazing for a console imo, as long as treyach is being serious about optimization I'll be happy because black ops originally ran like shit until they released 15 fucking patches to make it feel better.
I swear to christ treyach, the lag was completely bad, I really hope you've learnt your lesson with that.
(bring back the console to Single Player please)
[QUOTE=qwerty000;36123012][IMG]https://dl.dropbox.com/u/17610513/ZScreen/2012-05/Screenshot-2012-05-30_00.36.54.jpg[/IMG]
yeah
and this is on a foreground of a cutscene[/QUOTE]
its an ingame cutscene that you zoomed in on
[QUOTE=FullStreak12;36126464]its an ingame cutscene that you zoomed in on[/QUOTE]
And a cutscene of all things should look nice, considering they're able to focus on rendering just this one cutscene, instead of all the complex things you see in gameplay.
And it's hardly that much of a zoom in, I noticed it before he pointed it out and so did he obviously.
It's not a cutscene, it's actual gameplay. That's the model they use for the character.
[QUOTE=FullStreak12;36126464]its an ingame cutscene that you zoomed in on[/QUOTE]
He didn't zoom in at all.
[QUOTE=FullStreak12;36126464]its an ingame cutscene that you zoomed in on[/QUOTE]
he cropped it genius.
The graphics are dated get over yourself.
Why are so many people bitching about graphics on a Quake 3 engine game anyway, they obviously aren't out to push any technical boundaries, just add a few niceties every game or two.
[QUOTE=dass;36119368][img]http://www.albatrossrevue.com/wp-content/gallery/mw4merc/mwmerc-04.jpg[/img]
I'm sorry, you were saying?[/QUOTE]
Doesn't beat this
[IMG]http://i649.photobucket.com/albums/uu218/JKN1178/starwarswalker.gif[/IMG]
Have we completely forgotten about gameplay over graphics? As long as it looks good from a distance and has good, smooth gameplay I really couldn't care less
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
