• Battlefield 4 Second Assault DLC to have four fan-favorite BF3 maps
    62 replies, posted
Honestly after SimCity I'm done with pretty much all games coming from EA's core lineup Expensive on launch (and rarely dropping in price), Origin exclusive, DLC that assumes you buy them in order to actually stay current with where all the players are playing (BF3), extreme price gouging DLC or in-game purchasable items (only somewhat for BF3, mostly for SimCity in that I can now have an AIRSHIP DLC that sends airships to neighboring cities... for $9?), always-online bullshit (though it makes sense for BF4 so whatever), etc. Not to mention, to put it frankly, the jump from BF3 to BF4 just seems way too sudden, way too early, and way too much like BF3 for me to be interested. There's just way too much bullshit that comes with EA's core titles now. You either get always online DRM and price gouging, or "focus tested" produced tripe and price gouging, or sequel-itis that is basically the last game again and price gouging, etc. [editline]27th June 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=Janus Vesta;41211215]Fucking Metro. No one likes Metro, it's only used by idiots who want to get gold stars and badges quickly.[/QUOTE] Its literally one of the worst designed maps in any multiplayer game I've played and the only reason why its popular is because its the easiest map for players to take advantage of the XP system to grind for points. AKA, it a terrible map that encourages players to play it via exploitation of your reward system, which is why its popular. That sounds like a failure in design to me.
[QUOTE=theevilldeadII;41208528]it could come out as free DLC in that case[/QUOTE] i too don't like to be compensated for hundred of hours of work [editline]27th June 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=Janus Vesta;41211215]Fucking Metro. No one likes Metro, it's only used by idiots who want to get gold stars and badges quickly.[/QUOTE] Metro is dope if you're playing on a 32 player server that spans the entire map, and on the Russian team. Eating nails is preferable to Metro in any other way. Metro will suck even [I]more[/I] if they don't combat the stupid "russians always win" and "hey guys let's have THOUSANDS OF TDM SERVERS in the inside portion of metro!!!! who needs fun when you have POINTS!"
[QUOTE=milkandcooki;41216110]i too don't like to be compensated for hundred of hours of work [editline]27th June 2013[/editline] Metro is dope if you're playing on a 32 player server that spans the entire map, and on the Russian team. Eating nails is preferable to Metro in any other way. Metro will suck even [I]more[/I] if they don't combat the stupid "russians always win" and "hey guys let's have THOUSANDS OF TDM SERVERS in the inside portion of metro!!!! who needs fun when you have POINTS!"[/QUOTE] The conquest that span the whole map was more fucked than anything. It was just the Russians pinning down the other team against the back wall until it was over. They must've gotten the interns to make half the maps for that game.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.