Texas teen was abused with hot oil, broomsticks for refusing arranged marriage
127 replies, posted
I was told by a moderator that tudd is hezzy's and I think gurant's responsibility? every other moderator was told to piss off and not reprimand him. It's really weird to have two mods responsible for one dude's behavior but hey whatever I'm probably just a dumb idiot.
I wish I had a super cool no girls allowed club to go and complain about Facepunch to, ideally a club full of peopIe know from Facepunch
oops sorry didn't mean to chimp out!!
Ive been hearing the same with other mods. Hence why hezzy shat his pants and locked the forum chat thread after a ton of people came to him asking why does 30ish people get banned for one user who's obviously starting shit in the first place. I would just put him on ignore so half the thread feed isn't clogged with shit, but you cant do that anymore.
How much context do you need? What would it take to prove that maybe there's a bit more to this than just wanting him banned because of my political bias?
https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/172/cfee6fe4-2f5f-4f1f-ba76-5872a1fd624f/image.png
I could've easily taken that first line, put it in the middle of the last dump, and make it look way worse than it is. But the context changes it completely. This is just harmless venting on Tudd's part, and he's totally justified in a lot of what he's saying. There ARE people who take their bias against him way too far. There ARE posts that skirt around the no flaming rule, insulting everything from a person's character to their entire ancestry, and getting away with it because they didn't say "fuck you". Even now, we're not talking about the article, and he's right about that too.
https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/172/f8b5f163-3a7a-40d2-a73c-a008d8d54a1e/image.png
https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/172/8ba4bbac-edb2-4038-bfb3-54d44bdb2d65/image.png
https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/172/31a7b906-0ed6-40a0-8244-90a520bd848b/image.png
And then he says this literally seconds later
I would hazard a guess that the difference is that trolling has become an accepted political technique since the sanius squad was around. and tudd is so far up trump's butt that banning him would be seen as attacking the intellectual diversity of facepunch or whatever.
or they just find him funny to keep around, probably that.
Ultimately MaxofS2D got banned for shitposting. It wasn't really his opinions that got him tossed as much as the fact he was being a snarky, annoying fuckwit about them.
Most people who claim there's some kind of political hivemind going on in Facepunch and who complain they got banned for opinions are actually just rancid shitposters. Tudd's entire claim to remaining unbanned is because his shitposting toes the line just about enough. It got so fucking stupid that there's efforts going on to catalog and scrutinize every dumb thing Tudd says because that is virtually the only way we can get rid of one of the most obvious sources of disruption of the forum.
His ability to never stay banned is obnoxious considering the fact he managed to post like seven threads in a day or two and absolutely cluttered the already tight-spaced SH front page. Even the whole "just ignore him!!!" argument loses its value when A) the forum doesn't even have an ignore feature anymore and B) ignoring Tudd doesn't give those six or seven thread spaces back.
>context
Lol no there is not. That's the entire problem is hyperbiased political posters, context gets thrown right out the window immediately. With posts, with conduct, with ratings, and the leftists do it just as much as the rightists, if not more.
Perhaps news and reviews can be just that without needing to adding zero-contextual bias on top of that. I don't want to hear about it after hearing about it all day everywhere else
also if you think chimp out is just a phrase, bro, I've got some sweet tahiti redwood forest property I can sell you.
If he wants to help his arguing skills so bad, maybe he should start with justifying his continued slavish devotion to an amoral, unstable, egomaniac that continues to act exactly how people spent a year telling him he would. :^)
Gotta shift that overton window to the left somehow
full communism now
You're gonna start flaming and trolling?
They might have initially cared about spreading their beliefs to people but they pretty clearly decided to just use facepunch as a place to wring tears from. Especially tpain.
Sounds familiar.
Just to go back to this but it might not be an entirely bad idea.
Because signal boosting all the bad things a class of people does inform people perception of those people. Also the nazis did it to the jews.
Wow, I did not expect this to have occurred in my own country. Usually when I read about arranged marriages it seems like something distant, not part of any contemporary Western culture, and certainly not something that could happen so close to home. This almost sounds like human trafficking on the part of the parents, and I hope they get put away for a long time for it. How fucked in the head do you have to be to sell your own children like this?
https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/172/8ba4bbac-edb2-4038-bfb3-54d44bdb2d65/image.png
I dont think I have ever seen Tudd actually argue, mostly just posting then hiding when anyone comes up with a counter argument or just responding to certain parts of a post.
my god even if he isn't permabanned I wouldn't show my face here again. this is the forum equivalent of a homicide in the streets
He will never answer to any post that has actual facts proving him wrong. Only when there is some mistake in the wording that allows him to weasel out another stupid argument about how white people are better without actually ever saying it.
I was gonna say this.
I've always believed his entire continued presence is some sort of inside joke among those on mod team who strive to keep around (especially when last year they actually MODDED him for a day on April Fool's Day, and then let him keep that intrusively big frog avatar for months afterwards), and even hearing that it's just Hezzy now doesn't change that. I don't know if he's keeping Tudd here as some sort of pet or village idiot that makes for some "wily trollface japes", or to act a sort of living idiot-cull where people who are too "stupid" to pick up on some unspoken rule that only exists in Hezzy's head not to respond to Tudd's bait get banned far more severely than Tudd ever will, or what. Banning any discussion of the guy back on Oldpunch (and by extension discussion of mods or policies so we can't even complain about that) was bad enough.
But now - as Ganerumo said - here on Newpunch thread list pages are much smaller and we lose the user ignore feature, so it's not possible to "simply" ignore Tudd anymore, especially since his thread output has gone into overdrive in the last day or so. He's become a genuine pain in the ass. It's not even due to his political beliefs or defense of Trump - a lot of people get on Chonch for that too, but among other things at least Chonch will stick around and argue his position rather than just run away and barf out another bait thread - but it's because what Tudd is doing is transparent as hell and he does it with carte blanche from the staff when others have gotten permabanned for far less. I hate throwing someone out of a community by mere group rule regardless of how much of a bad actor they are, but until users get some sort of tool to personally minimize Tudd's presence such as a restored ignore feature or something, we can't keep him around like this. Half of SH's first page yesterday was just Tudd's bait topics. Something's gotta be done.
It's slightly pedantic but wouldn't it better if they refer to it as forced marriage rather than arranged marriage just like Independent's title?
These threads also drag the worst of polidicks back into SH, doesn't really seem fair for people who were specifically trying to avoid that.
Excuse me? whatever you guys think about the OP aside (I'm out of the loop). How is this not newsworthy? somebody got beat and hot oil poured on them...
Simply put because the OP is trying to push his agenda about black people and muslims being ~evil~. You'll never see him post articles about how muslim communities help authorities find radicalized members, or how a black guy saved a cop.
You know what I mean, I never intended the racist undertones you claim...
No one's saying that this event wasn't newsworthy or terrible. They're only pointing out the possible intentions of the person who made it.
possible intentions = definite ones that were transparent like 2 years ago, that he has admitted to multiple times
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.