Richest 1% on target to own two-thirds of all wealth by 2030
129 replies, posted
I am perfectly calm, my thoughts just contain a lot of profanity.
But you cant demand that i take it perfectly well that you say "you literally have no idea about this x thing you're ranting about". That comes off like you're on the offence there skippy.
Well, you're literally implying that if the US were to be (somehow, god knows how that would work) removed from the economy, that things would become better.
Which is completely false. The world economy took a hit when the recession happened specifically because the US dollar is such a backbone to the world economy as a whole.
https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/249570/c7f1f558-b4a5-4756-b6f3-494e3de1fc2e/image.png
Honestly, everyone benefits from global trade. Cutting an entire nation out, let alone one as massive as the United States, would damage the world economy beyond measure.
wo! calm down tiger. We only just got you back! stick around for a while
I'm not literally saying that we wall Usa in and cut it off from the outside world, I'm saying that the united states is probably not going to be the financial center of the world for much longer if it keeps dropping the world economy on the floor.
I agree that the US economy needs to shape up, but it also honestly isn't doing poorly. The numbers don't lie.
Also, it definitely appeared at first that you were saying to literally do that. I mean, your first post was literally
Well somehow those people will have to be stifled, and part with some or all of their money, because there is no way the world can continue chugging on with a tiny, tiny sliver of the population becoming ever more exponentially rich. That's all i'm saying. We've already seen your middle-class evaporate steadily, we do not want that to happen to us too.
So wait, are you saying that the world should or should not figuratively wall off the US? You've just given two conflicting answers.
Our economy benefits you, our corporations don't threaten you whatsoever and they will continue to not threaten you for as long as your government remains sane.
You literally can't just block money like that. It's just flat not possible unless we hit some sort of dystopian future where some governing body attempts to embargo the entire United States via force.
Did you use Chad as your surrogate person because a "Chad" is genuinely the favoured ideal person that _thedonald and the like want to have in the world?
Which specific individuals would you like to focus on? I can talk about more than a few specific people.
It's really more like if Chad took your lunch money, your parent's lunch money, and your government's lunch money and then expected you to work extra hard to make up for the lost money he took
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.