Man Resonant, you seem to be easily convinced by anything running askew to the mainstream telling of events. Sandy Hook was embellished by crisis actors, the Skripals weren't poisoned by Russia.
Let me guess, those soldiers in Ukraine that looked suspiciously like Russians weren't actually Russians and 9/11 was an inside job too, right?
Probably because all but 7 of them were the bodies of children between the ages of 6 and 7? Is that enough of a hint that you can find the deductive reasoning as to why no photos exist? Columbine wasn't an elementary school.
Journalism etiquette and limitations due to investigation.
Of course there are photos. Does that mean you should have access to them because of your dumb baseless theories? No, of course not.
Cease these unlawful accusations immediately. I cannot postulate as to why there exist no images of the deceased perpetrator?
There's a distinct difference between "does not exist" and "I do not have them".
Of course they exist, but you have no privilege to access them. Probably a good thing.
Your smart comments are unwarranted. You really think yourself to be witty don't you? I am simply an observer who is asking a question in a public forum. What I have observed is this: In some instances an image of the deceased killer is released to the public and in other instances it is not. Who or what makes that determination?
Literally who?
Nah, Seano is his own brand of shitposting.
You are factually wrong and intentionally misrepresenting my post in order to portray yourself as virtuous. I never mentioned anything about images of the victims. I would never expect to see such heart-wrenching images. Also to imply that asking normal questions in regards to a massacre is somehow mocking and insulting victims is absolutely ludicrous. In-fact you are the one shitposting with some crazy conspiracy theory that I am some other named individual. Please cease this nonsense.
Yes that is a fair point you have made about different investigation teams make different decisions on what they will and will not release into the public. I have taken this information from you and I thank you for your input.
Not once in this thread did I even imply support for any theory. I operated under no such facade and only wished to take note of any interesting answers. I do not understand this aggression as well as this obsession with this poster you mentioned earlier. It appears to me that you are just out for blood and wish to be seen as virtuous by other members of this community. What's the point?
Now we have strayed so far from the topic of our friendly waterfilter salesPERSON that only one post in this entire thread mentions his name. Say whatever you want about this man but he has been extremely entertaining over the past ten years. Think of all the memes. Now he has pretty much destroyed himself in many different ways and I cannot help but feel pity.
To answer you in a no bullshit way:
Different police departments, different journalistic entities, different people altogether handle the different cases - and they are handled differently for sure.
Some groups of people want photographic evidence published, some groups want photographic evidence withheld because they are sensitive.
It's very dangerous to jump to the assumption that they do not exist. Remember that there are several reasons why the police and the families would not want these photos published.
because it is mocking and insulting
KIDS ARE FUCKING DEAD. i'm not going to frame this as a pro/anti gun post because that's not the point. there are families who won't get to see another birthday of their kid, and you think it isn't fucking insulting to say "why didn't i see your dead child's body, unless i see a body how do i really know they died"
go sit in a crisis support group, and feel those emotions, and then imagine thinking that marginalizing them by waving their dead kids away as actors isn't a despicable action
It is disrespectful to post images of the dead,particularly children. This issue as the norm for much of human history.
And if they did post it, you would go off on how some jpeg artifact was proof of a green screen or something.
I love how the alternative to "yeah some asshole shot the school up" is an absurd wild conspiracy theory that requires massive cover ups and brain washing in order to work, and the deeper you go the more retarded the theory and intent behind it all gets
Don't even dignify these nutbars with a response.
If they did have the high definition media of mutilated child corpses as they so adequately crave- they'd just simply shrug it off as impressive props, quick to point out and circle how clearly fake and unnatural the brain matter looks in the photos.
Crisis actor theorists may be new on FP, but conspiracy theorists in general are not. There's consistently been at least one anti-west poster on FP since the days of RAYHALO and that Spanish guy whose name I can't remember. Pretty much any thread about 9/11 brings a handful of truthers out of the woodwork, even if they're only there to rate someone else's cries of conspiracy agree. And then you have guys like Conscript who aren't quite conspiracy theorists but constantly expect groups they don't like to have some kind of violent and malicious plans without any real evidence to suggest that they do.
Fucking shit dude maybe it has something to do with the fact that it was a bunch of violently murdered children
Didn't they admit to just be joking in the end or am I remembering that wrong?
Please apply Ocam's razor and realize why faking this event would not only be non-beneficial, but also how it would be completely impossible to cover up.
If somebody wanted to cause panic about guns or whatever and they were an ~evil government organization~, follow your own logic. They'd just get some actually mentally unstable person to go and actually commit a real shooting. Your logic is not self-consistent.
r/WatchPeopleDie is up your ally
Looks like we'll have to get ANOTHER forty people to submit to perpetual silence and kill their children!
Holy shit batman, i thought you were crazy with saying the gassing was all fabricated, but then you actually try to show sandy hook might have been faked.
This shit again? Come the fuck on. Why are there no parents that can confirm your belief that he is an actor? Why are there no Sandy Hook school staff that can confirm his daughter doesn't exist? Why would they hire an actor when a real parent could have done the same? Do you think this guy is being paid to keep the act up for the rest of his life? Staff, children, other parents as well? If there's 'alot of things' about this case that supports your conspiracy theory, why did you opt for the video of a distraught man in an insane situation acting slightly unusually, and not some other evidence that isn't weak as shit? Do you think traumatized people are incapable of laughing, or being hit by emotions quickly? If he is an actor, why do you think he laughed when he was already in view of countless cameras? How could he have missed that he was clearly being filmed? And quit pretending to be neutral, you're a conspiracy theorist. Stop using a video of a man acting unusually in an unusual situation and saying that that makes it 'fairly obvious' that he's an actor. And back up your claims with something stronger, because that video is weak as shit "evidence". And by the way, here's the debunk for the spliced photos argument you didn't back up, watch from 5:14 to 6:51.
Wasn't he originally perma banned for being a creepy paedophile apologist or something? I honestly can't remember.
You can disregard almost anything Resonant posts anymore. Not only does he seem to be "drinking the Kool-aid", but he seems to be butt-chugging it.
I think "I would hate to say it's real or not real" is a hilarious thing to say because this simply isn't something you get to be 'on the fence' on. You don't go "I don't know guys, he could be an actor" and then shrug as if you're playing a humble neutral party
"I mean its TOTALLY possibly that your dead daughter was a hired actor by the DEEP STATE and George Soros in an attempt to take the guns from GOOD, PATRIOTIC Americans and establish a Democratic Reich, but hey she could also have just been a regular 7 year old kid. I guess it's just one of those mysteries huh ¯\_(ツ)_/¯"
- Enlightened """Neutrals"""
Yeah, I do, but it still needs to be called out because there might be vulnerable and naive readers who will actually believe that there's something 'muddy'. Especially when it's so easily disproven, there's no reason not to show how utterly lazy and pathetic their claims are: "This photo was photoshopped, conspiracy???", "Okay but here's the version that wasn't photoshopped".
Bring back custom titles, label Resonant as the man who was forgotten by his tin-foil hat.
Yeah, my thoughts and prayers are with him.
Do you a single fact to back that up?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.