Want to view porn anonymously in the UK? You need a Porn-Pass™ license for that
96 replies, posted
Everytime you buy one a big pink alarm goes off and declares "THIS LADS GOIN FOR A WANK OI OI" and the code is printed onto the side of a dildo slightly too big to fit in your pocket.
Porn license...
the jokes write themselves
You need a license to do that.
Hey do you have a license for that license joke? Gunna have to report you to the Home Office for that one mate.
lmao fuck no we didn't. The Tory party are incredibly socially conservative (so long as they can get away with it, so they can't walk back gay marriage for instance) and Frau May has been pushing this kind of shit constantly. Their voter base are largely older people who are probably moral guardians about the whole porn "issue", but they almost certainly don't understand the issue and are just making a lot of noise about it. But remember, the Tories didn't win the last GE, May was originally never even elected into the Tory leadership role either. A majority of the country sure as shit don't want her, let alone her party running the place.
May has shown a constant inability to understand modern computing and how its impacting us as a society with her push for things like encryption backdoors, this porn blockade, the Snoopers Charter, etc.
"Anonymously" eh?
What's the chances that this'll be so poorly implemented, possibly deliberately, that your porn habits will be tied to the household the license is registered to. Giving Mummy May a chance to see what tickles your pickle and taking away some Mummy May Good Boy Points if its especially naughty.
How do you buy the pass anonymously lol
This will work not at all because anyone who watches porn underages does so through piracy. Even if the tube sites were to go through with this- there'll just be ways of getting around it which'll eventually be as common knowledge as incognito mode.
Right so, FP has a NSFW section...and FP is UK as well. We gonna get blocked or what?
As dumb as all of this is, the thought of someone needing a pass to get into Schindler's Fist is pretty hilarious.
So do women need a license to Jill?
https://imgkk.com/i/41m4.jpg
you need to be on schindler's list to access schindler's fist
Good thing you can just look into your spam folder on Gmail and find tons of bots sending you .gifs and pics.
The responsibility of what children can access online should fall on their parents, not the state. It's really not hard to set up a filter for those sorts of websites for when a child is using a phone or computer.
Or just use a VPN
Its like almost everyone expects someone or something else to raise their kids for them. It quite a terrifying thought for how the newer generations will be.
Let a dude nut,damn.
wouldn't hotlinking videos completely defeat the purpose?
This will be introduced and absolutely nothing change.
How do they even expect to enforce this?
Can we stop this far leftist bullshit? I know it doesn't affect me directly but it's still a load of spunk. I wouldn't want our lawmakers to view this and be like 'oh let's follow their example because it's working so well in Britain.'
ISPs already have opt-out content filters.
And come on, were your parents really aware of what you was looking at online?
I don't really see how this a "far leftist bullshit", seeing as this is the most right wing government we've had in decades, our prime minister is formerly our most right wing home secretary.
She's a fucking puritan who says her "faith in god lets her know she's doing the right thing", and she's entirely supported by an obscenely right wing press.
censoring what people can see online without permits is pretty much the total opposite of left.
Attempting to regulate something that the majority of people do on the internet. That sounds enforceable.
Joke's on you, I'll just shove it up my arse.
So wait, you have to pay to access free porn now?
I love how the right has somehow swindled people into believing that they haven't been in power since the 80s and also that they can't be Authoritarian. It's quite fascinating. Since when has Thatcherite social conservatism been far left?
I'm a far leftist and this is nothing to do with the beliefs of me or any of the two-dozen or so other leftists I regularly speak to. This is far-right conservatism, and it must not be stood for.
I don't identify myself as right-wing. If this is supposed to be guised as 'protecting the children', then I call thay leftist propaganda because it's the belief that something needs to be censored because it's offensive.
So you'll ignore any and all definitions of Conservatism to call something Leftist just because it fits into your incredibly slim and narrow world-view, likely spawned by twats on the internet whose only political influences are post-modern Twitter posters and shitty "political
aesthetic" tumblr blogs?
Something needs to be censored because it's offensive is arguably leftist, but something being censored because it's amoral is very, very right-wing.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.