Orrrr you could just not settle disputes via violent acts like a fucking caveman.
Because we have much more civilized and scientifically backed ways to prove your arguments. It would be like saying if i could beat your ass i can say the sky is brown and be right.
Thing is, if we two adults consent too a fight over a dispute, what's the problem with it? If it's legally backed, and a referee is making sure they don't kill each other, it should be fine.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hZ8tWYyMvc
Because its barbaric and childish. I shouldn't have to tell you why "billy bob can punch harder so hes right" is not empirical evidence.
not all disputes are over things which are based in empirical evidence, this isn't for shit like scientific disputes and implying as such is very silly.
For legal disputes, you need evidence to prove you are correct, not who can punch harder.
what about disputes like "fuck you man you're an asshole" and other social disputes? i wouldn't fight someone over that shit but if two consenting adults want to duke it out, i say a) let them, b) they're probably going to fight anyways, and c) it would be better for everyone involved if they could get a referee
Does the winner pay for the loser's torn flame shirt?
They can fight it out on Judge Judy, without the risk of potential life-threatening harm, broken bones, or permanent facial disfigurements - and they still have a 'referee' to tell them who's right. Hell, it's not even their own damn money they're wagering when they show up; they lose nothing and get to air their grievances on national TV.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
