how much of a bootlicker do you have to be to go "oh she was working overtime, she just got a little spooked and murdered the guy that's all"
Yes because the police are on facepunch reading your posts and making sure they align themselves with such bastions of logic such as yourself. But seriously, reply to my large post or another post with specific points on how I "embarrassed myself." But If you have nothing of substance to contribute do me a favour and don't reply.
http://commonsenseatheism.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/strawman.png
Look , I know it is tempting to put in effort into your opinions but unashamedly listening to tweets from random people and dogmatically making one opinion on the issue from them is the way to go. Especially if they align with the first reply to the thread. I am sorry that I am not able to hold a candle to such wonderful standards.
Explanation =/= excuse if you couldn't figure it out.
I'm talking about the fact they arrested her, but keep ignoring the facts and keep adhering to your wackozade logic mate. You look like a total twat.
https://twitter.com/AlyssaKinsey8/status/1038621406039298049
unit labeling is illuminated 24/7
they're trying to frame this as an accident and it better not work.
What are you talking about? She was arrested for manslaughter, not murder, meaning not premeditated like your explanation.
Also:
Jean and Guyger did not have any known relationship prior to the shooting, [Attorney] Merritt said.
^ From the article Timof2009 links earlier on this page.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
