Youtuber Shirrako's account allegedly banned for killing a feminist NPC in RDR2 - Sensationalist Headlines

shes annoying because she spouts the same few voice lines over and over endlessly, shes a broken record

That applies to every minor NPC and most major NPCs For a direct comparison, Shirrako has made two videos about the eugenics supporter, a similar NPC in the exact same town as the womens' suffrage protester, and doesn't call him annoying or feed him to various animals in either video.

most NPCs dont stand in 1 place for a long period of time (or for as much as i can tell, the whole length of the game) and repeat 3-4 voice lines every time you see them. also: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AeGRpxl78yU his latest video has him killing that particular NPC, what are you talking about

The adoring fan is a stalker he will randomly initiate dialogue and follow you everywhere. That's annoying. Having an NPC say the same couple lines is just normal NPC economy, you should be amazed that there even is a women's suffrage activist in the game because nobody would give a shit if there wasn't one.

Yes, that was the sentence that I said, thank you for confirming. I believe the specific part you didn't understand was: There's actually a few that I've personally come across. One is the eugenics supporter, who we already covered.

I mean to be fair the suffragette is built to be noticeable. She stands in one strategic location right next to a tailor, so you walk/ride by her often and have to hear her when accessing most businesses. She's louder than 90% of other NPCs in the area and her voice will always come through. She has dedicated subtitles which also seem to trump all other subtitles in the area, because she's flagged as a point of interest and not just random chatter. You really can't ignore her. That is really kind of the point. It's like the dude screaming about his friend Gavin that you find in several different cities.

so it matters the way that he kills them? dead is dead dude, doesnt really matter if they got thrown off a cliff or fed to an animal. and he refers to the guy as hitler in the title (appropriately so), so i think thats a pretty negative enough way to refer to someone, worse than being called "annoying" tbh. shes not even a good feminist, from what i can tell from the dialogue when you actually talk to her shes a sexist. she generalizes men with "men are such judgmental pricks" and that "women are needed to help straighten you out", and earlier basically suggests that war and other such terrible shit is due to men only having the vote, and that women would do a better job.

There's a little bit of a difference between killing someone in a fist fight and shooting someone in the face with a shotgun at point blank distance so you can carry their corpse to a farm to be fed to pigs.

Yeah one is more fun to do, it's cool you can feed corpses to pigs in that game I gotta try it out.

How are you on a gaming forum and still have such a mind blowingly bad take on this?

On a male NPC obviously. I'm not a misogynistic pig.

Oh I was about to have words with you

why are you dumbing "hogtied to be kidnapped to then be punched off a cliff so they fall to their death" down to "killed in a fist fight" though either way both are more complex ways to be killing someone in the game compared to just shooting someone. as i said, dead is dead.

https://static.highsnobiety.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/02132009/logan-paul-dead-body-suicide-japan-01-480x320.jpg

To be fair, you know what's a more accurate comparison in Bethesda games to a character who stands in a heavy traffic area and shouts the same things over and over to a crowd of onlookers? https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/235561/88a2a32d-85f3-4069-8dc5-e1aa4e1d13ad/Heimskr.png https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/235561/616ee93c-f773-485e-80ba-8a35f01fd5be/Cromwell.png There are rather popular mods specifically to remove every single voiceline they will ever shout. And yeah, searching for them on Youtube will crop up loving murder montages by people who preferred the more direct approach within the first few relevant results.

There's literally millions of these under the name ryona, I've even seen one of Bane cracking Batman's back in Arkham Origins

It's a fetish thing

That is exactly what I said on the previous page.

I don't think even Steve Oedekerk could give a duh big enough to be appropriate here

they ban that guy but not this one? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwAus7x1B4E this society of ours has had a good run but now i'm afraid it's the end times been nice knowing y'all

If this is enough to get you banned off Youtube then I would have never of made it as a professional gamer. First thing I did after booting up RDR1 was start beating people to death, just because I could. I also see a doctor on Thursdays.

Come on though, we both know exactly what he was going for though. You only need to look at the comments to see what his viewers are like, and it's not like content creators attract those different from themselves

I don't judge people by the comments they didn't write. I'm not surprised that you have no goddamn idea what you're talking about. Get your head out of your ass.

I'm sorry, but we don't "Know". We can only assume. You think assuming means you know. It isn't, and you shouldn't. You don't know. I highly suspect it is, but we cannot say we "know" without being categorically wrong.

If you want to pretend there isn't a connection between the attitudes of a content creator and their audience, be my guest.

If people are responsible for what is said on their YouTube video comments then every YouTuber is a fucking Nazi Communist. Get real dude

You're misunderstanding my point. I'm not saying he's responsible for what they say - I'm saying that to have such a large portion of your userbase be these "anti-feminist" and "anti-SJW" types, you have to yourself lean in that regard. There's no smoke without fire.

Dude, if all you want is self justification for you to make whatever assumptions you want, you don't need it from us, you've already got your own permission to be as assumptive as you want But no one should validate you making assumptions like this, there isn't any real value to it.

I agree with you to an extent but sometimes the smoke goes where it thinks there is fire even if the fire isn't really there. I'm not making any real moral defense of this person -- at best he's a douche -- but people have become extraordinarily comfortable with labeling someone as "the enemy" with very little reason.

hmm... interesting... Real life NPCs are now taking the side of video game NPCs. I am not surprised.