Federal judge rules that police, school had no duty to save children
36 replies, posted
So to every non-American who finds it absurd that Americans want to be able to protect themselves, this is why. Because the police literally do not have to protect them.
“As
previously stated, for such a duty to exist on the part of defendants,
plaintiffs would have to be considered to be in custody” — for example,
as prisoners or patients of a mental hospital, she wrote.
Children are required to attend school by law. So fuck off
I've heard the opposite, and that here, like in the US, the cops owe nothing to any one individual.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.