Phoenix woman sent date 159k text messages, threatened to turn his kidneys into
41 replies, posted
Considering how often political threads have been popping up in here, I think the standards should probably get applied here as well. Unless we can post info wars here.
...point out some threads so that mods can move them?
I've been reporting them to the council but nothing's happened, I'm pretty sure mods don't have thread move tools.
Dude there have been days where I have flooded the event log with it. Report them and move on.
the event log still works? oh fuck, gotta go check that out
I dodged a bullet with a crazy chick once , I realize that she had the same look in her eyes as Jacqueline
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUsvTNmum8Y
This almost seems kinda sad to me. She's obviously not right mentally and such. She should be receiving treatment for her illness, not locked up and plastered all over the internet. Just seems like a way to really destroy someone's life completely instead of helping them.
Yeah I really don't see why she's being interviewed and put on display. That's like the opposite of what she needs
There’s research that suggest people can tell criminals apart just from their facial features.
Link?
Yeah but see, Bieber was excited to go to jail and meet all his big fans who want to turn him inside out.
Not him, but I'll add my share of super massive obsessive information.
It's been a while I read these sort of things but I hope this will answer his statement, and that I'm not incorrect and miss remember anything.
---
Humans can psychologicaly see through behavior, from speech, facial expression and body language, etc and have a various chance of seeing who's a bad or a good person depending on the scenario.
Criminal investigators has profiles of human behavioral science that provides material that shows which signs are more specific to that type of people, often used for gang related crimes, and serious cases. Read it in https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/ebs/ once, that includes the cross-trait assortment for intelligence of physical and emotional patterns were they experimented by showing non-criminals and criminals to a general audience (the Valla research, look below):
Here's the abstract of that part the book, because the book also includes parts that has nothing to do with criminology.
"A growing body of evidence suggests that rapid, yet accurate, dispositional inferences can be made after minimal exposure to the physical appearance of others. In this study, we explore the accuracy of inferences regarding criminality made after brief exposure to static images of convicted criminals’ and non-criminals’ faces. We begin with a background of research and theory on the curiously recurrent, and historically controversial, topic of appearance-based inferences of criminality, and a brief justification of our re-opening of the debate about the accuracy of appearance-based criminality judgments. We then report two experiments in which participants, given a set of headshots of criminals and non-criminals, were able to reliably distinguish between these two groups, after controlling for the gender, race, age, attractiveness, and emotional displays, as well as any potential clues of picture origin. Empirical and theoretical implications, limitations, and further questions are discussed in light of these findings. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA" ------ Valla, J. M., Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2011). "The accuracy of inferences about criminality based on facial appearance". Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology. More info: Valla
It's also kind of the same that Catherine Salmon (PhD in female sexuality) says females can see on men who would be the best partner to provide the best genes for her children, by his behavior and apperance see which traits would benefit the most, and also get a general profile of his personality by both pictures and short video clips. And lots of the female testers were correct. In criminal cases this applies to criminal behavior and their traits, and that's were law enforcement benefits from such research. There's an investigative department in the F.B.I that's called Behavioral Analysis Unit (iirc = NCAVC) that works on these things; what kind of criminal profile does this person have, what could the criminal do in the future, by using visual and non-visual patterns.
I've seen several documentaries they interview investigators and interigators and some say they can sense a bad person (usually murderers, and some can't be sensed such as rapists in the Valla research) by their facial features, just like how you can see on war veterans with the thousand yard stare that they've been affected by the terrors of conflict. The people in the field are so experienced in it they can sense it in some degree. But I wouldn't rely on the public to understand these behaviors in all situations, but some, but this time we have a cognitive bias because we already know this person commited this act. We do however can sense danger in a person by their looks, like the book above included; but it obviously doesn't mean they are bad, just a sense of survival instinct from the time we were cavemen.
Reminder: Investigators can see through crime activities and individual behavior what type of criminals they are, but not by their facial features (there a little research that says differently but can't be trusted yet), but they can see if it is a bad person (various results from different cases). It has been proven effective, and is therefore used by law enforcement, and they mostly spend those units and resources on tougher crimes that the local-PD can't handle.
Should really get back into criminology, has always been my special-interest. And thank you for reading my shit.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.