Psychology and medicine are full of bunk studies and the field itself is precariously positioned.
most people have heard about the "Reproduction" problem in the soft sciences. Not as many have heard about how easy it is to trick, or game, or hoax the system successfully.
Turns out, it's very easy because the majority of the publications that are taken seriously fail to vet the papers they publish quite often. If they appear ideologically aligned, they usually make it through. If they're not, they don't.
It's a really disturbing problem for liberal sciences to be under going, and it's all because of the zero sum mentality that has developed in the last 20 years in our political bubbles.
Me not small brained. Me big skulled!
If you think the reproduction problem is in soft sciences only, its also in the hard sciences as well.
Editor in Chief of The Lancet:
“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.”
its not the size that counts its how you use it
There are only so many folds a person can have. When you have them on your body, you remove them from your brain
my brains isn't small
fuck you
i thought they found this out ages ago
Yea I thought the same. I read a while back that obesity leads to brain atrophy.
You forgot the best part about being skinny, we also eat less.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
