https://www.overclock3d.net/news/gpu_displays/nvidia_s_reportedly_working_on_an_rtx_2070_ti_-_specs_leaked/1
Give me the fucking price cuts and then we'll talk. A $249 2060 would be a killer.
I can't wait for 6 individual versions of every card model
Now there are rumors flowing of a 1650 Ti, 2060 Ti and 2070 Ti…
Ring of Elysium patch notes:
https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/441/d7619c17-11a8-4f0b-a0b7-e326b002f371/image.png
Dell laptop adverts:
https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/441/e573ba25-ad1b-4c69-a081-0ff850fb82f8/image.png
Isn't that the nature of the silicon lottery? Some cards come out worse than others and they're branded as different versions.
If they release around the same time as Navi, then I'll just wait for the reviews on which card does better then make my decision
1650 ti makes some sense, there's a pretty big gap between the 1650 and 1660
Who are the 1650 and 1660 for though?
Aren't there a shitload of cards available that could actually fit the hole better?
Yeah, from their competition. So it makes sense that they make their own.
Watch it be released at the same time as Navi, having little performance gains over the RTX 2070 and costing $100-$200 more.
Nvidia has to stop releasing shit cards when AMD announces something. They're desperate and if they keep doing this, they'll lose in the long run and AMD's market share will increase.
but you got loads of other cards before, that aren't that old to warrant these imo
They already have versions of the 2000 series in the form of the 1600 series, and the 2000 series has the 50, 60, 70, 80. And then beyond that the TI series is a stronger version of cards, so it only makes sense to apply it to the 80 series cards.
For consumers that aren't incredibly savvy with cards, this shit is CONFUSING
https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/716/70f6a27f-e33e-49bf-8f6e-dcd9a0a9e7a6/image.png
It should just be like this
https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/716/06708406-7ecb-4c3d-8fcf-fc59f67335c7/image.png
With the 50 and 30 series being low end and cheapest
Pascal cards aren't produced any longer.
but still sold
Wouldn't make sense if Nvidia didn't make a replacement, it's going to be a better product than what its replacing (The 3 GB 1060).
Also Laptop OEMs really like efficent cards; Turing is a bit more efficent than Pascal.
Then why does Turing have way more transistors and have way higher TDPs? Why are ITX length 2060 cards using beefy triple slot coolers?
If anything Turing feels like a step back with the RTX slogged on to compensate.
Remember that the 2060 replaces the 1070. The 2060's TDP is only 10 watts high than the 1070 (Granted it has less memory and more efficient memory), but the RTX stuff increases TDP.
The improved efficency is obvious on the lower end stuff that lacks RTX, the 1650 beats the 1050 ti at 75 watts, and the 1660 beats the 1060 at 120 watts. And all of these cards use GDDR5.
The Ti versions, for the most part, aren't just higher binned/clocked, they're actually bigger chips. Cut down versions of bigger chips, to be specific.
Oh yea,that makes sense
Turing is based on the 2000 series but without rtx right? Something like that?
Turing is both the RTX 2000 and GTX 1600 lines of cards.
Right, rtxless cards
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
