Tower Hamlets rejects concerns over Muslim foster family -READ OP FOR LATEST UPDATES- - Sensationalist Headlines

[QUOTE=Super Muffin;52845477]Thank you for editing the OP. Please continue to give us reasons to not assume the worst from you.[/QUOTE] Sadly I have to imagine most people who just accused me of things will just make excuses why their horrible assumptions were right or that what I just did wasn't sincere. Even though I have offered to do this recently before: [url]https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1583585&p=52826979&viewfull=1#post52826979[/url]

[QUOTE=Tudd;52845517]Sadly I have to imagine most people who just accused me of things will just make excuses why their horrible assumptions were right or that what I just did wasn't sincere. Even though I have offered to do this recently before: [url]https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1583585&p=52826979&viewfull=1#post52826979[/url][/QUOTE] Agreed Tudd. Making horrible assumptions about people without having all the facts isn't at all right. I think we all learned something today.

[QUOTE=Tudd;52845517]Sadly I have to imagine most people who just accused me of things will just make excuses why their horrible assumptions were right or that what I just did wasn't sincere. Even though I have offered to do this recently before: [URL]https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1583585&p=52826979&viewfull=1#post52826979[/URL][/QUOTE] You consistently throw out these news stories with the sole purpose of painting Muslims and other groups you're against in a terrible light, trying to stir up drama and convert people to your disgusting world view, and when inevitably your stories are proven bullshit you have the gall to go around and say it's other people making horrible assumptions. Maybe if you didn't trawl for news that could fit in a Breitbart article and shit out threads to make drama across videos and the news boards, people wouldn't have to call you out on stupid shit on a weekly basis.

Isn't this grounds for a libel lawsuit? Though I guarantee that no action will be brought against the Times for this.

[QUOTE=Tudd;52845517]Sadly I have to imagine most people who just accused me of things will just make excuses why their horrible assumptions were right or that what I just did wasn't sincere. Even though I have offered to do this recently before: [url]https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1583585&p=52826979&viewfull=1#post52826979[/url][/QUOTE] You've admitted to trawling conservative sources for stories that will upset people. You've also admitted to debating in bad faith. Its a completely fair and just assumption.

[QUOTE=Amber902;52846471]You've admitted to trawling conservative sources for stories that will upset people. You've also admitted to debating in bad faith. Its a completely fair and just assumption.[/QUOTE] Well I didn't admit to those statements at all like that. Also I usually use left-center sources more than right-center and I intentionally do that. So your first statement is just wrong. The second one you might have confused with the time I mentioned that some people simply write far more in a post then what I would hope to spend time on for fast conversations like these where topics come and go. So yah, in no way "completely fair."

[QUOTE=Tudd;52846517]Well I didn't admit to those statements at all like that. Also I usually use left-center sources more than right-center and I intentionally do that. So your first statement is just wrong. The second one you might have confused with the time I mentioned that some people simply write far more in a post then what I would hope to spend time on for fast conversations like these where topics come and go. So yah, in no way "completely fair."[/QUOTE] you outright said you got "most" of your stories from Milo's website a while back. "Left-center" my ass

[QUOTE=Amber902;52846532]you outright said you got "most" of your stories from Milo's website a while back. "Left-center" my ass[/QUOTE] Oh I mentioned before I get stories from aggregates/referrers like Milo, TYT, Dailywire, or other heavily biased sites, but I always use them to just find out what other more respectable sites have reported on the issue and maybe get a good laugh from the loaded language those bias-sites use. I am sure just like most people you have some sites you visit that we could all pick apart. I am just a bit more honest about it. My actual sites I use as my go to MSM sites are Reuters (Left-center) and Deustche Welle (Left-center) mostly because I like their format. DW is really good with my interest in German/Germany aswell. But please do look at the previous threads I made and what sources I used to list them. They are typically left-center sources. Just this week someone called an article I used as fake news and it was from the New York Times, so I guess I can never win between you and that guy. Even though imo, left center is no better from right center in the grand scheme of things. People here on FP just prefer it on average.

[QUOTE=Tudd;52846571][B]Just this week someone called an article I used as fake news and it was from the New York Times[/B], so I guess I can never win between you and that guy.[/QUOTE] I was joking.

[QUOTE=Raidyr;52846582]I was joking.[/QUOTE] You aren't that guy though?

[QUOTE=Tudd;52846571]Oh I mentioned before I get stories from aggregates/referrers like Milo, TYT, Dailywire, or other heavily biased sites, but I always use them to just find out what other more respectable sites have reported on the issue and maybe get a good laugh from the loaded language those bias-sites use. I am sure just like most people you have some sites you visit that we could all pick apart. I am just a bit more honest about it. My actual sites I use to go for MSM are Reuters (Left-center) and Deustche Welle (Left-center) mostly because I like their format. DW is really good with my interest in German/Germany aswell. But please do look at the previous threads I made and what sources I used to list them. They are typically left-center sources. Just this week someone called an article I used as fake news and it was from the New York Times, so I guess I can never win between you and that guy. Even though imo, left center is no better from right center in the grand scheme of things. People here on FP just prefer it.[/QUOTE] Half of your stories are local stations that are cited by conservative news aggregators. What your doing is like going on conservapedia, finding articles with source links to msnbc, and posting the source instead of the article to try and obfuscate your bias.

[QUOTE=Amber902;52846597]Half of your stories are local stations that are cited by conservative news aggregators. What your doing is like going on conservapedia, finding articles with source links to msnbc, and posting the source instead of the article to try and obfuscate your bias.[/QUOTE] Actually they aren't local stations either. You didn't really look did you? Here are the last 10 news threads I have made and what their leanings are according to mediabiasfactcheck.com: [url=https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1584274&highlight=]CNBC - Left Center[/url] [url=https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1576684&highlight=]Independent - Left Center & Times - Right Center[/url] [url=https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1583995&highlight=]Reuters - Left Center[/url] [url=https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1583713&highlight=]Alanta Journal - Left Center[/url] [url=https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1583851&highlight=]International Business Times - Least Biased[/url] [url=https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1583979&highlight=]Telegraph - Right Center[/url] [url=http://wgntv.com/2017/10/30/meth-found-in-childs-halloween-candy/]Local Affiliate[/url] [url=https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1583993&highlight=]Telegraph - Right Center[/url] [url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/early-lead/wp/2017/10/29/as-catcher-bruce-maxwell-who-knelt-during-national-anthem-arrested-on-gun-charge/]Washington Post - Left Center[/url] [url=https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1583172&highlight=]Local French News - Unsure[/url] So from that list it doesn't look like at all what you just stated. We can keep going, but you would only look more and more wrong. If anything, I probably use the most wide-range set of news sources of anyone on this website, but it I do make sure they tend to be left-center leaning.

[QUOTE=Tudd;52846624]Actually they aren't local stations either. You didn't really look did you?[/QUOTE] Local news sites Tudd has used as sources [url]http://www.abc15.com/news/mesa-mothe...independence-1[/url] [url]http://www.nbc26.com/newsy/this-comi...h-nazi-cosplay[/url] [url]http://www.miamiherald.com/news/loca...180411111.html[/url] [url]http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/201...e-speech-week/[/url] [url]http://www.9news.com/news/local/inve...ts-1/466845236[/url] [url]https://www.dallasnews.com/news/educ...e-name-changes[/url] [url]http://wkrn.com/2017/09/15/lipscomb-...e-centerpiece/[/url] [url]http://cbs4indy.com/2017/06/15/suspe...flag-on-i-465/[/url] This is barely the surface. Furthermore the diversity of your source material actually hurts your case as it further indicates the use of a conservative news aggregator as I find it unlikely you go to this many local news sites on your own. [editline]1st November 2017[/editline] Dont lie if its so easy to prove you wrong.

[QUOTE=Amber902;52846646]Local news sites Tudd has used as sources [url]http://www.abc15.com/news/mesa-mothe...independence-1[/url] [url]http://www.nbc26.com/newsy/this-comi...h-nazi-cosplay[/url] [url]http://www.miamiherald.com/news/loca...180411111.html[/url] [url]http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/201...e-speech-week/[/url] [url]http://www.9news.com/news/local/inve...ts-1/466845236[/url] [url]https://www.dallasnews.com/news/educ...e-name-changes[/url] [url]http://wkrn.com/2017/09/15/lipscomb-...e-centerpiece/[/url] [url]http://cbs4indy.com/2017/06/15/suspe...flag-on-i-465/[/url] This is barely the surface. Furthermore the diversity of your source material actually hurts your case as it further indicates the use of a conservative news aggregator[/QUOTE] I would be more impressed if you actually took a sample size and did a linear extrapolation rather than just searching among-st all my threads for every local source I ever posted. Talk about clear cherry-picking, especially when I post several articles a day sometimes. I don't even see what is wrong with using local sources or me using an aggregate that I already acknowledge I use. Facepunch is an aggregate that is bias to the left aswell and I don't blame anyone for that like how you are doing. How about you actually judge the articles by a case by case basis instead as a rule of thumb? And what is your real argument here now? Because at this point it seems like you would only be satisfied if everyone used a select few websites you approve of and never use an aggregate that leans left or right for news. That isn't realistic nor is that how the rest of Facepunch/members operate. I am just more amazed you just actually cherry-picked instead of using a real way to extrapolate a trend though.

[QUOTE=Tudd;52846658]I would be more impressed if you actually took a sample size and did a linear extrapolation rather than just searching among-st all my threads for every local source I ever posted. Talk about clear cherry-picking especially when I post several articles a day sometimes. [/quote] Talk about backpedalling and more lying. Those are all from the first two pages of your posted threads, threads I picked at random.. There are a lot more of them then that. Furthermore all the extrapolation I need from this is that you buy into the shit you're posting, and you have a vested interest in posting it here. Either to shill out or to rile up. [quote] I don't even see what is wrong with using local sources or me using an aggregate that I already acknowledge I use. Facepunch is an aggregate that is bias to the left aswell and I don't blame anyone for that like how you are doing. How about you actually judge the articles by a case by case basis instead?~ [/quote] My case by case analysis of each of those threads is that they're localized statistically irrelevant cases that dont make it past state level news sources. [quote] And what is your real argument here now? Because at this point it seems like you would only be satisfied if everyone used a select few websites you approve of and never go to a aggregate.[/QUOTE] My argument is that your post history indicates a clear and rigid bias that you very clearly and very thinly try to obfuscate, and that you debate in bad faith, as evidenced by your multiple outright lies in this conversation.

[QUOTE=Amber902;52846675]Talk about backpedalling and more lying. Those are all from the first two pages of your posted threads. There are a lot more of them then that. Furthermore all the extrapolation I need from this is that you buy into the shit you're posting, and you have a vested interest in posting it here. Either to shill out or to rile up.[/quote] If did exactly what you said by using the first two pages of the threads I created, then you found out [b]8 out of 68[/b] articles I posted in SH or Polidicks used a local news source. [quote]My case by case analysis of each of those threads is that they're localized statistically irrelevant cases that dont make it past state level news sources.[/quote] So what? When has that ever mattered? Talk about being instantly dismissive and close minded. [quote]My argument is that your post history indicates a clear and rigid bias that you very clearly and very thinly try to obfuscate, and that you debate in bad faith, as evidenced by your multiple outright lies in this conversation.[/quote] I already admit to a bias just like everyone else on here has. Also you seem to be willing to make up lies at this point unless you came up with your numbers differently.

[QUOTE=Tudd;52846697]If did exactly what you said by using the first two pages of the threads I created, then you found out [B]8 out of 68[/B] articles I posted in SH or Polidicks used a local news source.[/QUOTE] more lies. [URL]http://www.abc15.com/news/mesa-mothe...independence-1[/URL] [URL]http://www.nbc26.com/newsy/this-comi...h-nazi-cosplay[/URL] [URL]http://www.miamiherald.com/news/loca...180411111.html[/URL] [URL]http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/201...e-speech-week/[/URL] [URL]http://www.9news.com/news/local/inve...ts-1/466845236[/URL] [URL]https://www.dallasnews.com/news/educ...e-name-changes[/URL] [URL]http://wkrn.com/2017/09/15/lipscomb-...e-centerpiece/[/URL] [URL]http://cbs4indy.com/2017/06/15/suspe...flag-on-i-465/[/URL] [URL]http://wjla.com/news/local/man-attac...mother-a-slave[/URL] [URL]http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2017/...ump-test-quiz/[/URL] [URL]http://atlantablackstar.com/2017/10/...ite-supremacy/[/URL] [URL]http://www.nbc26.com/newsy/this-comi...h-nazi-cosplay[/URL] [URL]http://www.10news.com/news/white-pri...s-extra-credit[/URL] [URL="http://www.theolympian.com/news/local/article173710596.html"]http://www.theolympian.com/news/local/article173710596.html [/URL] The list is now 14 that I can be assed to find in the first two pages. The more you lie, the longer the list gets. Furthermore if you don't think the source matters, then why are you lying about it? [quote] So what? When has that ever mattered? Talk about being instantly dismissive and close minded.[/quote] It matters because you're clearly trying to use them to overrepresent barely existent issues used as conservative talking points. [quote] I already admit to a bias just like everyone else on here has. Also you seem to be willing to make up lies at this point unless you came up with your numbers differently.[/quote] The difference being that most of us can see past our bias and debate in good faith. Something you clearly cannot do with your repeated lying. I also have not lied once in this discussion. [editline]1st November 2017[/editline] As a matter of fact two of the conservative sites that show some of these links are websites called "chimpmania" and "niggermania" and are the top google results when searching. So take that as you will. [editline]1st November 2017[/editline] Search this link for proof [url]http://wjla.com/news/local/man-attac...mother-a-slave[/url]

How to Tudd-post in SH/Polidicks: Step 1) Subscribe to all the alt-right/conservative aggregates you can Step 2) Cherry-pick the best ~10-15 articles that really 'trigger the liburrls' Step 3) Remove articles that don't pass mediabiasfactcheck (Should have about 3-4 now) Step 4) Post article with a single line commentary zinger at the end Step 5) [B]Never[/B] fully agree with the article you post. Always sit on the fence about the article you just sourced for your agenda. Step 6) When confronted, argue semantics endlessly, throw a strawman, or source an alt-right Youtube network (must be "related to Alex Jones Channel") Step 7) Get some users banned for getting enraged at your article or debating Step 8) Leave thread for other users to get angry and banned Step 9) If the article ends up being a false-flag, exposed as fake, or otherwise untrue... it doesn't matter! You already won!

Honestly what bothers me is the only aggregate sites with these stories are some of the most racist and vile places on the internet, which means Tudd is probably lying about being on the fence about these issues.

[QUOTE=Amber902;52846721]more lies. [URL]http://www.abc15.com/news/mesa-mothe...independence-1[/URL] [URL]http://www.nbc26.com/newsy/this-comi...h-nazi-cosplay[/URL] [URL]http://www.miamiherald.com/news/loca...180411111.html[/URL] [URL]http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/201...e-speech-week/[/URL] [URL]http://www.9news.com/news/local/inve...ts-1/466845236[/URL] [URL]https://www.dallasnews.com/news/educ...e-name-changes[/URL] [URL]http://wkrn.com/2017/09/15/lipscomb-...e-centerpiece/[/URL] [URL]http://cbs4indy.com/2017/06/15/suspe...flag-on-i-465/[/URL] [URL]http://wjla.com/news/local/man-attac...mother-a-slave[/URL] [URL]http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2017/...ump-test-quiz/[/URL] [URL]http://atlantablackstar.com/2017/10/...ite-supremacy/[/URL] [URL]http://www.nbc26.com/newsy/this-comi...h-nazi-cosplay[/URL] [URL]http://www.10news.com/news/white-pri...s-extra-credit[/URL] [URL="http://www.theolympian.com/news/local/article173710596.html"]http://www.theolympian.com/news/local/article173710596.html [/URL] The list is now 14 that I can be assed to find in the first two pages. The more you lie, the longer the list gets. Furthermore if you don't think the source matters, then why are you lying about it?[/quote] I really don't get why you keep doing this to yourself. 14 out of 68 still isn't "half of your articles" you claimed. You are still off by alot. Also I am not lying as what is shown is still correlating with what I said. I am directly tackling your lie that keeps changing because I keep calling you out on it though. [quote] It matters because you're clearly trying to use them to overrepresent barely existent issues used as conservative talking points.[/quote] I think the very nature of posting news is over-representing an issue since a lot of stories never get told or shown. I would say the talking points and generalizations I specifically made are more key than what sources I am using if they are verified. [quote] The difference being that most of us can see past our bias and debate in good faith. Something you clearly cannot do with your repeated lying. I also have not lied once in this discussion.[/quote] Everyone thinks that of themselves, but that doesn't you do or do not. Also you have repeatedly lied in this thread and I keep on showing that with how you have handled this sourcing issue. [quote] As a matter of fact two of the conservative sites that show some of these links are websites called "chimpmania" and "niggermania" and are the top google results when searching. So take that as you will.[/quote] Horrible sites that I have never heard of or used. Are you just witch hunting now? [quote] Search this link for proof [url]http://wjla.com/news/local/man-attac...mother-a-slave[/url][/QUOTE] 404 error and not sure what this is proof of. [editline]2nd November 2017[/editline] [QUOTE=Amber902;52846775]Honestly what bothers me is the only aggregate sites with these stories are some of the most racist and vile places on the internet, which means Tudd is probably lying about being on the fence about these issues.[/QUOTE] Are you really going to disingenuously attribute every site you can find that used a local source for it's horrible and insane opinions on me now? Do you not understand how easy that is to do to just paint people an extremist with little to no evidence for it? It'd be like me calling people a Soviet-murderer for the fact they post anything slightly liberal since some Marxist site reposted an article. I mean truly, now you are just beating the Drumhead here. You are being quite a terrible person with your baseless accusations.

[QUOTE=Tudd;52846789]I really don't get why you keep doing this to yourself. 14 out of 68 still isn't "half of the articles" you claimed.[/quote] Those are the ones I could, at the time be assed to find [url]http://www.abc15.com/news/mesa-mothe...independence-1[/url] [url]http://www.nbc26.com/newsy/this-comi...h-nazi-cosplay[/url] [url]http://www.miamiherald.com/news/loca...180411111.html[/url] [url]http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/201...e-speech-week/[/url] [url]http://www.9news.com/news/local/inve...ts-1/466845236[/url] [url]https://www.dallasnews.com/news/educ...e-name-changes[/url] [url]http://wkrn.com/2017/09/15/lipscomb-...e-centerpiece/[/url] [url]http://cbs4indy.com/2017/06/15/suspe...flag-on-i-465/[/url] [url]http://wjla.com/news/local/man-attac...mother-a-slave[/url] [url]http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2017/...ump-test-quiz/[/url] [url]http://atlantablackstar.com/2017/10/...ite-supremacy/[/url] [url]http://www.nbc26.com/newsy/this-comi...h-nazi-cosplay[/url] [url]http://www.10news.com/news/white-pri...s-extra-credit[/url] [url]http://www.theolympian.com/news/local/article173710596.html[/url] [url]http://www.wfmynews2.com/news/nation/civil-war-museum-closes-after-confederate-flag-removed-1/442782537[/url] [url]http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2017/0...rsenal-arrest/[/url] [url]https://www.life.arizona.edu/jobs/so...tice-advocates[/url] [url]http://www.kmov.com/story/35668532/c...south-carolina[/url] The number is now 18, the more you lie the more I post. [quote] Also I am not lying, I am directly tackling your lie that keeps changing because I keep calling you out on it.[/quote] Except you've lied about 3 times now [quote]If did exactly what you said by using the first two pages of the threads I created, then you found out 8 out of 68 articles I posted in SH or Polidicks used a local news source.[/quote] lie [quote]Actually they aren't local stations either. You didn't really look did you?[/quote] lie [quote]If anything, I probably use the most wide-range set of news sources of anyone on this website, but it I do make sure they tend to be left-center leaning. [/quote] Lie, you stated you get your news from conservative aggregates. [quote] I think the very nature of posting news is over-representing an issue since a lot of stories never get told or shown. I would say the talking points and generalizations I specifically made are more key than what sources I am using if they are verified.[/quote] They never get shown for the same reason everyone in town doesn't know that billy took a shit in the urinal at school. Because its so minor as to be completely insignificant. [quote] Everyone thinks that of themselves, but that doesn't you do or do not. Also you have repeatedly lied in this thread and I keep on showing that with how you have handled this sourcing issue.[/quote] Quote my lies. [quote] Horrible sites that I have never heard of or used. Are you just witch hunting now?[/quote] Do you really want me to keep digging into the cesspools you get your sources from? Several of these articles are only posted on some pretty vile websites. [quote] 404 error and not sure what this is proof of.[/QUOTE] [img]https://puu.sh/ycS87/d1896a75f1.png[/img] Those are essentially the only sites that have a link to the article. So I ask again, do you really want me to keep digging?

[QUOTE=Amber902;52846813]Those are the ones I could, at the time be assed to find [url]http://www.abc15.com/news/mesa-mothe...independence-1[/url] [url]http://www.nbc26.com/newsy/this-comi...h-nazi-cosplay[/url] [url]http://www.miamiherald.com/news/loca...180411111.html[/url] [url]http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/201...e-speech-week/[/url] [url]http://www.9news.com/news/local/inve...ts-1/466845236[/url] [url]https://www.dallasnews.com/news/educ...e-name-changes[/url] [url]http://wkrn.com/2017/09/15/lipscomb-...e-centerpiece/[/url] [url]http://cbs4indy.com/2017/06/15/suspe...flag-on-i-465/[/url] [url]http://wjla.com/news/local/man-attac...mother-a-slave[/url] [url]http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2017/...ump-test-quiz/[/url] [url]http://atlantablackstar.com/2017/10/...ite-supremacy/[/url] [url]http://www.nbc26.com/newsy/this-comi...h-nazi-cosplay[/url] [url]http://www.10news.com/news/white-pri...s-extra-credit[/url] [url]http://www.theolympian.com/news/local/article173710596.html[/url] [url]http://www.wfmynews2.com/news/nation/civil-war-museum-closes-after-confederate-flag-removed-1/442782537[/url] [url]http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2017/0...rsenal-arrest/[/url] [url]https://www.life.arizona.edu/jobs/so...tice-advocates[/url] [url]http://www.kmov.com/story/35668532/c...south-carolina[/url] The number is now 18, the more you lie the more I post.[/quote] Why don't you just actually get to the half like you originally claimed. You keep just looking silly at this point with this weird build-up you keep trying to display. [quote] Except you've lied about 3 times now lie lie Lie, you stated you get your news from conservative aggregates. [/quote] They are lies because it is based on you messing up over and over again. The last point isn't even a lie because it is true that I use a wide-range of sources whether you like it or not. [quote] They never get shown for the same reason everyone in town doesn't know that billy took a shit in the urinal at school. Because its so minor as to be completely insignificant.[/quote] That is incredibly relevant and contextually to what people believe is important to them and sort of a non-point you are making. [quote] Do you really want me to keep digging into the cesspools you get your sources from? Several of these articles are only posted on some pretty vile websites.[/quote] You can post all the vile websites in the world that reposted these articles. It proves nothing but that you are willing to non-sensically attribute I somehow look at every single one of them with no evidence. [quote] [img]https://puu.sh/ycS87/d1896a75f1.png[/img] Those are essentially the only sites that have a link to the article. So I ask again, do you really want me to keep digging?[/QUOTE] Please do, you look ridiculous right now. I never use those sites, nor heard of them, and think they are horribly racist just based off the name alone.

[QUOTE=Tudd;52846829]Why don't you just actually get to the half like you originally claimed. You keep just looking silly at this point with this weird build-up you keep trying to display. [/QUOTE] Because my lazy ass can't be assed to look through your entire history at midnight, but its fairly obvious that its there. Furthermore why do you keep lying? [quote] Their not lies because it is based on you messing up over and over again. The last point isn't even a lie because it is true that I use a wide-range of sources whether you like it or not.[/quote] Those are lies, stop bullshitting. The last ones a lie because you don't use a wide variety of sources, you use 3-4 aggregate sites and post the articles they cite. Indicating that you only go to 3-4 sites for your news. [quote] You can post all the vile websites in the world that reposted these articles. It proves nothing but that you are willing to non-sensically attribute I somehow look at every single one of them with no evidence.[/quote] Show me where you got the articles from then. I dare you. [quote] Please do, you look ridiculous right now. I never use those sites, nor heard of them, and think they are horribly racist just based off the name alone.[/quote] How's anyone supposed to believe that when you keep lying? You also snipped the part where I ask you to show me where I lied so clearly you can't actually find any instances of me lying. [editline]1st November 2017[/editline] Lets continue to count with Tudd [url]http://www.abc15.com/news/mesa-mothe...independence-1[/url] [url]http://www.nbc26.com/newsy/this-comi...h-nazi-cosplay[/url] [url]http://www.miamiherald.com/news/loca...180411111.html[/url] [url]http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/201...e-speech-week/[/url] [url]http://www.9news.com/news/local/inve...ts-1/466845236[/url] [url]https://www.dallasnews.com/news/educ...e-name-changes[/url] [url]http://wkrn.com/2017/09/15/lipscomb-...e-centerpiece/[/url] [url]http://cbs4indy.com/2017/06/15/suspe...flag-on-i-465/[/url] [url]http://wjla.com/news/local/man-attac...mother-a-slave[/url] [url]http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2017/...ump-test-quiz/[/url] [url]http://atlantablackstar.com/2017/10/...ite-supremacy/[/url] [url]http://www.nbc26.com/newsy/this-comi...h-nazi-cosplay[/url] [url]http://www.10news.com/news/white-pri...s-extra-credit[/url] [url]http://www.theolympian.com/news/local/article173710596.html[/url] [url]http://www.wfmynews2.com/news/nation/civil-war-museum-closes-after-confederate-flag-removed-1/442782537[/url] [url]http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2017/0...rsenal-arrest/[/url] [url]https://www.life.arizona.edu/jobs/so...tice-advocates[/url] [url]http://www.kmov.com/story/35668532/c...south-carolina[/url] [url]http://www.cbs8.com/story/35396150/injured-boy-hospitalized-after-hit-and-run-suspect-deported-15-times[/url] [url]http://www.sfchronicle.com/business/article/Bay-Area-demonstrators-may-be-paid-to-protest-by-11125584.php[/url] [url]http://www.nbcmiami.com/news/local/Dashcam-Video-Released-Showing-March-DUI-Arrest-of-Lawrence-Fishburnes-Daughter-in-Fort-Lauderdale-421273993.html[/url] [url]http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/Shots-Fired-at-Northlake-College-School-on-Lock-Down-Police-421179724.html[/url] [url]http://www.theindychannel.com/news/crime/pc-church-organist-who-reported-vandalism-was-actually-the-one-who-did-it[/url] The number is now 23 on this episode of counting with Tudd. [editline]1st November 2017[/editline] btw some of the links break from repeated quoting, so just go back a few posts and they'll be fine.

[QUOTE=Amber902;52846841]Because my lazy ass can't be assed to look through your entire history at midnight, but its fairly obvious that its there. Furthermore why do you keep lying?[/quote] Why did you even bother checking if you are going to leave yourself woefully short? You aren't going to find half out of that sample size, it is that simple from me glancing at my first 2 pages. You have clearly already invested so much in the first two pages of my started threads apparently. I don't see why you are making a "I'm lazy" case now. [quote] Those are lies, stop bullshitting. The last ones a lie because you don't use a wide variety of sources, you use 3-4 aggregate sites and post the articles they cite. Indicating that you only go to 3-4 sites for your news.[/quote] I already posted how I go about using news sources and what other people largely do. I am not going to apologize for a behavior that this very website does in the form of SH and Polidicks. [quote] Show me where you got the articles from then. I dare you. [/quote] I already told you pretty much the gist of it. [quote] How's anyone supposed to believe that when you keep lying? You also snipped the part where I ask you to show me where I lied so clearly you can't actually find any instances of me lying.[/QUOTE] More like I snipped it cause it is so evident without me listing. - You have lied and failed to show half or more of my articles are local based. - You are now stating to people I probably use sites like "chimpout.org" or hold their opinions and other trash on a baseless notion simply because they reposted the same article. - You continually suggest statements like "You admit to debate in bad faith" and then misconstrue/not even cite where I make that statement. Instead all you been doing is calling me a liar with little to no evidence to back your claims or the statements I supposedly made. I am probably going to end talking about this subject with you since it hugely off-topic now with the main article, and the moderators don't need to interrupt us with bans to stop that, but feel free to post on my wall or PM me if you want to continue this discussion. I would suggest to stop being so baseless though.

[QUOTE=Tudd;52846871]Why did you even bother checking if you are going to leave yourself woefully short? You aren't going to find half, it is that simple. [/QUOTE] Because I want you to admit like a man rather then continue to lie [quote] You have clearly already invested so much in the first two pages of my started threads apparently. I don't see why you making a "I'm lazy" case now.[/quote] It doesn't take much effort to prove you wrong, and I've been adding to the list each time you lie so you'll just admit it. Furthermore its fucking laughable that the only arguments you can make are casual dismissal and harping on a single sentence. [quote] I already posted how I go about using news sources and what other people largely do. I am not going to apologize for a behavior that this very website does in the form of SH and Polidicks.[/quote] I don't care how you get your sources. I care about you lying and I care that you get your shit from horrible racist shitholes like "niggermania" and Pol. [quote] I already told you pretty much the gist of it.[/quote] Shitty copout answer. Give me the websites you use, if you don't then you're clearly trying to hide them for very obvious reasons. [quote] - You have lied and failed to show half or more of my articles are local based.[/quote] No. [quote] - You are now stating to people I probably use sites like "chimpout.org" and hold their opinons and other trash on a baseless notion simply because they reposted the same article.[/quote] Prove me wrong and show me where you got the article. [quote] - You continually suggest statements like "You admit to debate in bad faith" and then misconstrue/not even cite where I make that statement. Instead all you been doing is calling me a liar with little to no evidence to back your claims or the statements I supposedly made.[/quote] I called you a liar because you unambiguously lied to me. [quote] 8 out of 68 articles I posted in SH or Polidicks used a local news source.[/quote] I have 23 links that would like to have a word with you [quote] I am probably going to end talking about this subject with you since it hugely off-topic now with the main article, and the moderators don't need to interrupt us with bans to stop that, but feel free to post on my wall or PM me if you want to continue this discussion.[/quote] AKA You don't want to man up to your lying and bad faith debating. [quote] I would suggest to stop being so baseless though.[/quote] Whats baseless exactly? [editline]1st November 2017[/editline] [quote]- You are now stating to people I probably use sites like "chimpout.org" [/quote] I never mentioned a chimpout.org actually. Weird how you'd have that site in your head.

Tudd, the reason there's a problem with you just dumping shit here from conservative aggregate sites is because those news aggregate sites highlight particular stories to [i]push an agenda[/i]. It's different from just looking over an online newspaper because while newspapers are ostensibly there to report the news, with bias in one way or another, your aggregates share and publicize stories as a way of promoting their own messages. When you post in patterns that really come off like they're just reposted from your aggregates, it makes it seem like you're either pushing those agendas yourself, or you're reposting news stories without stopping to think [i]why[/i] they're being highlighted and shared. When it comes to stories like this that don't even pass the sniff test, (oh no, a perfectly innocent darling Christian girl being thrown to Muslim, west-hating savages that don't even speak English at the tyrannical behest of the State!!), I can't say they're painting a very positive picture of your aggregates or yourself especially.

[QUOTE=Tudd;52846871] - You are now stating to people I probably use sites like "chimpout.org"[/QUOTE] Did you just have a freudian slip there? :v:

[QUOTE=gokiyono;52846962]Did you just have a freudian slip there? :v:[/QUOTE] Nah, just made it up a name since the website names were likewise ridiculous. Didn't realize there was racist forum once called "Chimpout.com."

[QUOTE=Tudd;52846972]Nah, just made it up since the website names were getting ridiculous. Didn't realize there was racist forum once called "Chimpout.com."[/QUOTE] uhuh.

[QUOTE=Tudd;52846972]Nah, just made it up a name since the website names were likewise ridiculous. Didn't realize there was racist forum once called "Chimpout.com."[/QUOTE] You have a rather odd train of thought, then. How do the two words have anything to do with what you are arguing about?