Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 setting pre-order records
69 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Raidyr;35831331]I've played Black Ops more than MW2 and MW3 because it was just a better designed game.[/QUOTE]
It was better designed, but the core isn't changing that much and it's getting boring
I dunno why they don't just name them like the Madden series
Call of Duty 2012/2013/2014
and so on
[QUOTE=LuckyLuke;35822319]If I wanted to experience a futuristic online shooter, i'd play BF2142[/QUOTE]
Good luck with that when there's only a couple of populated servers.
[QUOTE=markg06;35831840]Good luck with that when there's only a couple of populated servers.[/QUOTE]
And they are all running shitty maps.
[QUOTE=Kai-ryuu;35822909]i have some good news and bad news
good news: your post is correct
bad news: "/le sigh" keep that idiotic shit in Reddit[/QUOTE]
Aren't you that guy sadistic guy that is into necrophilia?
Starting to see a cycle
>blops was announced
>"OH MY GOD THIS ONE MIGHT ACTUALLY BE GOOD"
>dissapointment
>mw3 was announced
>"Pffft this one is gonna be shit again" - us "YAY ANOTHER" - cod fans
>suprise suprise, it sucked
>blops 2 is announced
>"OH MY GOD THIS ONE MIGHT ACTUALLY BE GOOD"
Sonic cycle 2: FPS boogaloo?
If they make a game that take longer than a year to make then I may possibly think about probably renting it if I think I might have the time to play it.
[QUOTE=Steven :D;35831362]Call of Duty: [b]Super[/b] Modern Warfare[/QUOTE]
Then they'll make an exclusive for the Xbox and name it, "Super Call of Duty: Modern Black Warfare 360".
This is was a bad post.
[QUOTE=little.sparrow;35841177]Starting to see a cycle
>blops was announced
>"OH MY GOD THIS ONE MIGHT ACTUALLY BE GOOD"
>was good
>mw3 was announced
>"Pffft this one is gonna be shit again" - us "YAY ANOTHER" - cod fans
>suprise suprise, it sucked
>blops 2 is announced
>"OH MY GOD THIS ONE MIGHT ACTUALLY BE GOOD BECAUSE IT ADDS IN NEW STUFF NEVER DONE BEFORE IN COD GAMES AND NOT EVEN DONE IN RECENT FPS GAMES"
Sonic cycle 2: FPS boogaloo?[/QUOTE]
ftfy
[QUOTE=cdr248;35841353]If they make a game that take longer than a year to make then I may possibly think about probably renting it if I think I might have the time to play it.[/QUOTE]
Well get ready to rent it then, considering they take 2 years to make a game.
Textbook definition of sheeple.
i find myself questioning why this is every time i read or hear about call of duty setting new sales records
i kind of expected the fad to have died out by now, it's just the same rehashing every year
And this is why companies like Activision and EA still exist.
It doesn't matter how much people bitch, if they still buy their shitty games, we are sending a message to them that this shit is ok.
Black ops was good, World at War was good, Why wouldn't Black Ops 2 be good?
[QUOTE=mysteryman;35841522]Textbook definition of sheeple.[/QUOTE]
Haha using the word sheeple in a sentence unironicly.
the name annoys me
It is seriously the most uncreative thing ever
[QUOTE=Higginz511;35843437]Black ops was good, World at War was good, Why wouldn't Black Ops 2 be good?[/QUOTE]
I agree with this completely.
Blops, WaW, and COD4 are the only good ones In my opinion.
Blops 2 will be more enjoyable than MW3, and it will be everything Blops 1 wasn't.
Judging from the trailer, it looks pretty good (compared to the other COD games)
[QUOTE=cdr248;35841353]If they make a game that take longer than a year to make then I may possibly think about probably renting it if I think I might have the time to play it.[/QUOTE]
They spend two years making it, since they have two teams working on them. One released a year, two years on development.
Please don't make me say what I have to say in all the other COD news threads please
[QUOTE=bobsynergy;35841376]>"OH MY GOD THIS ONE MIGHT ACTUALLY BE GOOD BECAUSE IT ADDS IN NEW STUFF NEVER DONE BEFORE IN COD GAMES AND NOT EVEN DONE IN RECENT FPS GAMES"[/QUOTE]
There isn't even any gameplay yet.
Look, ignoring anything else, this might be pretty good if it embraces the futuristic thing and does something fun with its weapons and things.
Black Ops made a great party game, join up with buddies and spend hours pubstomping.
[QUOTE=Higginz511;35843437]Black ops was good, World at War was good, Why wouldn't Black Ops 2 be good?[/QUOTE]
World at War sucked because of the NES start-from-the-beginning-when-you-die difficulity.
Okay maybe my game was broken but it was fucking hard to get past the two first levels because of this :v:
Surely I'm not the only person who thinks of CoD games as two distinctive companies? Hence, why I only get it every couple of years. Looking forward to this.
I really hope treyach bring back these effects some how, this is what made black ops killer
[t]http://i.imgur.com/5Jiah.jpg[/t]
[t]http://i.imgur.com/Hl9nK.jpg[/t]
[t]http://i.imgur.com/tl1vK.jpg[/t]
Of course something with a fan base that buys up almost anything related to it is gonna set pre-order records. Especially when it can be pre-ordered 6 months before release.
[QUOTE=Indyclone77;35822431]To give it credit they are trying to do something different for once[/QUOTE]
I give credit mostly to treyarch. They seem to be the ones that bring in new content. IW just goes back to the same formula.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.