[QUOTE=Map in a box;33193048]Hate to be the devils advocate, but I find those results heavily biased.
[editline]8th November 2011[/editline]
I even have an apple fanboy friend that agrees that most of iOS apps suck[/QUOTE]
There are far more utility apps on Android which is great since I don't really like mobile gaming.
Malicious app? I thought it was a delicious app
[QUOTE=garry;33184675]You guys need to make your mind up. You complain that the review process exists, then you complain that it isn't strict enough?[/QUOTE]
For me it's more that this is a bit embarrassing for Apple - I don't want their control to be stricter, but letting something like this through, and then actually punish the guy that found out? That's just dumb.
[QUOTE=Map in a box;33192604]Android: Quality
Appstore: Quantity[/QUOTE]
There are very few Android exclusives, though. All of the best apps are on both.
[QUOTE=garry;33184675]You guys need to make your mind up. You complain that the review process exists, then you complain that it isn't strict enough?[/QUOTE]
I think it's more of what this indicates. We often hear of them banning an application for going against their policy of uh certain purity, or coding aproaches or if it conflicts with their interests.
Yet they let something actually malicious pass trough. It begs the question, what is the app review process actually for.
Obviously they must catch some openly malicious stuff as well, but what we hear tends to be more ideological.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
