Surprisingly, WWI is exactly where Battlefield belongs
98 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Janus Vesta;51002435]Nah, the tanks in BF1 are much more limited than the tanks of other games. A significant portion of your view on the top and bottom is blocked off, they move a lot more slowly, they have more trouble going up hills, the firing speed seems slower but that might be a placebo effect on me, the light tank doesn't get a support gunner, the heavy tank has severely restricted aiming ability.[/QUOTE]
the restricted view would be a legitimate argument if the tanks didn't have third person view available. too bad that third person makes operating a landship with just two people really easy to do and makes light tanks essentially invulnerable. light tanks also have about twice as much health as they should.
[editline]5th September 2016[/editline]
actually why the hell are they even allowing repairing tanks from inside? removing that would solve so many issues.
[QUOTE=Zezibesh;51003324]the restricted view would be a legitimate argument if the tanks didn't have third person view available. too bad that third person makes operating a landship with just two people really easy to do and makes light tanks essentially invulnerable. light tanks also have about twice as much health as they should.[/QUOTE]
One of the reasons I'm looking forward to hardcore mode.
[QUOTE=Zezibesh;51003324]the restricted view would be a legitimate argument if the tanks didn't have third person view available. too bad that third person makes operating a landship with just two people really easy to do and makes light tanks essentially invulnerable. light tanks also have about twice as much health as they should.
[editline]5th September 2016[/editline]
actually why the hell are they even allowing repairing tanks from inside? removing that would solve so many issues.[/QUOTE]
used three dynamite on a light armoured tank and didn't destroy it
feels unnatural, but I'm not sure if it's meant to be historically accurate, which if it is I am unsure on it's potential
It feels unbalanced.
3 (prior 2) C4 in Bf4 would destroy a MBT in Bf4
[QUOTE=Scratch.;51003939]used three dynamite on a light armoured tank and didn't destroy it
feels unnatural, but I'm not sure if it's meant to be historically accurate, which if it is I am unsure on it's potential
It feels unbalanced.
3 (prior 2) C4 in Bf4 would destroy a MBT in Bf4[/QUOTE]
it's not historically accurate at all but that doesn't really matter, what matters is that the light tank is taking as much damage as a heavy tank. unless you've got friends on voice chat there's no reason ever to go heavy tank.
[QUOTE=Zezibesh;51003955]it's not historically accurate at all but that doesn't really matter, what matters is that the light tank is taking as much damage as a heavy tank. unless you've got friends on voice chat there's no reason ever to go heavy tank.[/QUOTE]
Took me both my AT grenades and three Dynamite to kill a light tank.
[QUOTE=TheTalon;51003194]No but there were enough MP40's to equip all 64 players of a server with one. This game has rifles that have more people in one game of conquest using than there even existed in real life.
Basically this is Battlefield 4, meshed with some Battlefront mechanics (And not the bad ones, mind you), and given a World War 1 skin. Battlefront has a lower time to kill than this game. Probably by a large margin. And when you compare to BF3 or 4, there's a lot less content to play with. Right now, just choosing the Scout as an example, there's 8 weapons to choose from. Except there's 2 versions of each so there's 4. And 3 of the 4 (6 out of the 8) share the exact same stats, so really there's 2. And one does less damage PERIOD, so why use it.
I think given a hardcore mode that's like BC2, BF3 and 4, and NOT like Hardline will go a long way to make this game enjoyable for me, but without it I'm going to pass. Hardcore, and a 98K with iron sights is going to be me all day
I'll also be getting it on PS4 because fuck cheaters. Already being sniped with tanks from across the map during a sandstorm[/QUOTE]
So do BF3 and BF4. There was only ever 3 jackhammers made and very few street sweepers. Guess what?
Inauthentic across the board
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;51005299]So do BF3 and BF4. There was only ever 3 jackhammers made and very few street sweepers. Guess what?
Inauthentic across the board[/QUOTE]
The Jackhammer was also in BF2, making his point entirely baseless.
This game would really benefit from Hardcore
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.