[QUOTE=redBadger;44617471]
Crysis 3[/QUOTE]
Hell, the first iteration of Crysis is comparable to this.
[t]http://pcmedia.ign.com/pc/image/article/702/702309/crysis-20060419092912630.jpg[/t] [t]http://cf.shacknews.com/images/20140422/cod2014_29067.nphd.jpg[/t]
This game is more than 6 years old.
[QUOTE=gk99;44619567]It's Sledgehammer games, the guys that helped with MW3.
Not a fucking chance.
TBH I can't wait for the next CoD [sp]that's made by Treyarch because they're actually pretty good. The Black Ops series was the first recent CoD game to have a campaign I could beat without taking a month or six break. That said, everything since CoD4 made by IW/Sledgehammer has been a piece of shit.[/sp][/QUOTE]
While I agree to an extent the new I.W. is defiantly trash it's hard to call Sledgehammer trash without seeing a full game from them. MW3 was made in 8 months after Activision fired West and Zampella and some 40+ employes walked out of Infinity Ward. The proper thing to do would've been to delay the game but they didn't. They brought in Sledgehammer to help IW. I'm going to give Sledgehammer a fair chance, but I doubt this game will stray from the CoD formula. I do think Activison is fully aware that Call of Duty is dying, and that something needs to be done. I think that's the main reason they gave Treyarch another year.
too bad call of duty has been total shit to medicore on and off
I'm not expecting this to be any different but lets wait and see
They said the same thing with Cod:Ghost , and there was face screenshots too and look how the game feel and look.
Those eyelids eaugh.
[QUOTE=WheelyBins;44620894]Hell, the first iteration of Crysis is comparable to this.
[t]http://pcmedia.ign.com/pc/image/article/702/702309/crysis-20060419092912630.jpg[/t] [t]http://cf.shacknews.com/images/20140422/cod2014_29067.nphd.jpg[/t]
This game is more than 6 years old.[/QUOTE]
Not really comparable at all, the skin on the left one looks really flat and barely seems to have any actual shaders on it past just a diffuse texture.
So modern setting again?
Wish they'd go full on cyberpunk and/or futuristic. Black Ops 2 was too close to the present but it was a step in the right direction.
[QUOTE=seano12;44620105]CoD 1 was the best game did you not play the mods? There were so many good mods and CoD 2 had no good mods or maps.
Scratch that CoD: United Offensive was the best game and here's why:
-Fun vehicles and tanks
-New weapons like deploy-able machine guns and semi autos for the germans and russians
-Ability to call in artillery strikes once you had a high enough rank
-BIG ASS MAPS. Probably bigger than 90% of Battlefield 4's maps.
-Good mods and and good custom maps. There was this one cool mod that added Russian light tanks, 7 seat trucks, and half tracks.[/QUOTE]
i seriously loved UO, it was the first FPS i seriously played online and every CoD since has been balls by comparison.
the future is black
Pretty much no CoD player is going to care about sub-surface skin shaders let alone have any idea what they are.
If this is what they call next-gen, I'm not impressed.
[QUOTE=simkas;44622324]Not really comparable at all, the skin on the left one looks really flat and barely seems to have any actual shaders on it past just a diffuse texture.[/QUOTE]
It has decent lighting applied. Subtle effects are more realistic than OTT specular maps and heavy contrast lights.
Doesn't matter how detailed your models or textures are, lighting is what tackles the uncanny valley. Just look at MGSV, nice graphics but the models/textures aren't as high res as most games today it relies heavily on lighting to achieve its effects.
Seriously. It's a picture of a face. You won't even notice the faces five minutes into the game.
[QUOTE=STeel;44620394]If this level of detail will be consistent for many parts of the game to which you could get up close, and not exclusive to a few important faces I'd actually be very impressed.
I don't get all the hate this unreleased game gets based on one picture tbh[/QUOTE]
I wouldn't
Having detail 24/7 in a game has been done time and time again before.
It's time they completely overhauled the game and made it something we wouldn't call a CoD game.
Knowing them, its gonna keep on sucking ass.
[QUOTE=Rocâ„¢;44625278]I wouldn't
Having detail 24/7 in a game has been done time and time again before.
It's time they completely overhauled the game and made it something we wouldn't call a CoD game.
Knowing them, its gonna keep on sucking ass.[/QUOTE]
Treyarch's CoD games are actually decent, and they actually put effort into the game. With 3 years to work on the game, their next game could actually be really good.
[QUOTE=Durrsly;44625587]Treyarch's CoD games are actually decent, and they actually put effort into the game. With 3 years to work on the game, their next game could actually be really good.[/QUOTE]
[B][I]Could.[/I][/B] I gonna wait and see how things turn out at the end of the year. Might as well carry a blast shield with me.
The only picture I saw was with the close up of the nose and the bottom of the helmet. Sad, as I was kinda hoping it would be WWII.
[QUOTE=Plaster;44625742][B][I]Could.[/I][/B] I gonna wait and see how things turn out at the end of the year. Might as well carry a blast shield with me.[/QUOTE]
Treyarch made the legendary Spiderman 2 game, and Black Ops II is the only reason I still give a shit about Call Of Duty because it was decent.
can they please just start naming cod games like nba games
Call of Duty 2k14
[QUOTE=Durrsly;44627502]Treyarch made the legendary Spiderman 2 game, and Black Ops II is the only reason I still give a shit about Call Of Duty because it was decent.[/QUOTE]
You just reminded me of that, no game in this current generation or future will be able to beat that Pizza mission and it's legendary soundtrack
[editline]23rd April 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=Marden;44618020]I wonder if the soldiers finally hold their foregrips.[/QUOTE]
Which Call of Duty are you talking about? All the CoD's I've played have the soldiers holding the foregrip attachments properly
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
