• Why Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 needed a branching storyline
    47 replies, posted
First Person Shooter 2: Combat with a Weapon
[QUOTE=trotskygrad;35804780]titans can't move anymore :< no more titan AA gun battles[/QUOTE] I missed moving the Titan over the middle of Suez and being able to hit every missile silo.
[QUOTE=Tuskin;35804074]Kotaku made a nice list of facts of what they know so far. Some stuff I didn't know [url]http://kotaku.com/5906808/48-things-...y-black-ops-ii[/url] They seem to be putting a lot of effort into this[/QUOTE] I am genuinely very interested now.
[QUOTE=minilandstan;35796606]How is woods still alive? I thought he died in the first game.[/QUOTE] If the player types "cat notex2.txt" on the computer on the menu screen, a message from X appears saying that Woods is alive and being held in the Hanoi Hilton, the prison mentioned in the intel of "Payback". The message was sent on July 4, 1978. From the cod wiki
[QUOTE=Rankxerox;35796257]That picture look hideous. [editline]2nd May 2012[/editline] that trailer too[/QUOTE] Does it really matter? No.
Also according to all the rumors about the 80's missions, they may explain how Woods survived the explosion, I don't think they'll let that untouched.
[QUOTE=Lizzrd;35796845]It actually looks decent. Preeeeetty sure hell froze over a while ago...[/QUOTE] No then HL3/EP3 would have been announced
So I wonder how much of the game IS Call of Duty 4, still. As far as the game's skeleton goes, it's been the exact same since CoD4. Shit has Arthritus now, do something different for fucks sake
[QUOTE=TheTalon;35807964]So I wonder how much of the game IS Call of Duty 4, still. As far as the game's skeleton goes, it's been the exact same since CoD4. Shit has Arthritus now, do something different for fucks sake[/QUOTE] I think it would be pretty pointless for them to switch to a new engine on the eve of new consoles being announced.
[QUOTE=TheTalon;35807964]So I wonder how much of the game IS Call of Duty 4, still. As far as the game's skeleton goes, it's been the exact same since CoD4. Shit has Arthritus now, do something different for fucks sake[/QUOTE] What are you talking about? This is something different...
[quote]They even went so far as to bring a horse into the motion capture studio.[/quote] Oh wow.
Criticize modern warfare praise black ops go for the underdog FP
[QUOTE=Trogdon;35809695]Criticize modern warfare praise black ops go for the underdog FP[/QUOTE] We have a reason to praise this. They seem to be doing everything that makes a good game, a good game. I'm kind of excited for this.
[quote]Online Director Dan Bunting took us through a tech demo of the upgraded graphics; while lighting upgrades and tech aren't usually the most interesting topics, what they were showing looked great. As they put it, they are aiming for "PC quality graphics running at 60 FPS on a console." The illusion was quite convincing.[/quote] Who even believes that claim any more. BF3 on low still blows those screenshots out of the water. But as for the rest, I can only applaud the direction they're trying to take.
Will this game have hoverboards? They were made 10 years before the game takes place, so will they?
[QUOTE=Clavus;35811576]Who even believes that claim any more. BF3 on low still blows those screenshots out of the water. But as for the rest, I can only applaud the direction they're trying to take.[/QUOTE] Q3 engine. [editline]3rd May 2012[/editline] Wow Crysis looks a lot better than Doom!!!!!
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.