i played the bf3 alpha and i was so disappointed, the whole art aspect of it is amazing (sounds, animations, graphics), but the gameplay is literally a more polished bc2 and it's really stale
i picked RO2 instead because it looks a thousand times more fun, i might also get MW3 because i always liked the over-the-top multiplayer, amazingly fun with friends
it's like every neckbeard on this forum rushes to share their hatred every time they see a thread about cod games because it's popular when in reality it doesn't affect them in anyway
how come when i say something on this forum i get rated dumbs and sent death threats about how wrong i am and then 5 months later people say the same thing and it's communally accepted.
is there like a calendar or a programme so i can stay on schedule?
[QUOTE=thisispain;31839232]how come when i say something on this forum i get rated dumbs and sent death threats about how wrong i am and then 5 months later people say the same thing and it's communally accepted.
is there like a calendar or a programme so i can stay on schedule?[/QUOTE]
Has someone else said it?
If yes, say it
If no, say it and receive death threats
Has it been a while since someone has said it?
If yes, say it and receive death threats
If no, say it
To be honest with the amount of game changing rape BF3 is getting from EA, like the use of Origin and having to minimise the game to change servers, I might just get MW3.
[QUOTE=SnowCanary;31814688]Shit move but not game breaking. I won't deny that us BF3 players would be all over this if MW3 was the one making the mistake.[/QUOTE]
Wow, really?
Everyone seems SO mad because mw3 has dedicated servers (which people have been longing for some time now) but when bf3 doesn't you're like ''EH, STUPID MOVE''
[editline]20th August 2011[/editline]
Seems like blind defending to me.
Right.
So do they have proper dedicated servers or the Black Ops "dedicated servers"?
Battlefield 3 has dedicated servers, actually read the article next time.
[QUOTE=kennyrulez25;31812123]Thank you, someone else who finds BF3 to be overly hyped due to it's graphics. Graphics don't make a game plain and simple.[/QUOTE]
Uh I'm excited for the game because it's a true Battlefield game, the first since 2142.
I wouldn't call a reskinned BC2 a true battlefield game.
[QUOTE=zombojoe;31840628]I wouldn't call a reskinned BC2 a true battlefield game.[/QUOTE]
Well then that's good that Dice aren't making a game like that.
[QUOTE=simkas;31840647]Well then that's good that Dice aren't making a game like that.[/QUOTE]
I'll be honest, it isn't the same as 2142 or BC2. It plays as sort of a mix between the two games.
Juggernaut as a killstreak?
I LOVE IT! How it will work?
[QUOTE=SnowCanary;31840923]I'll be honest, it isn't the same as 2142 or BC2. It plays as sort of a mix between the two games.[/QUOTE]
So far all that we know is how the small-scale close quarters infantry battle plays like. And it actually plays well. Unlike BF2's close quarters infantry battle did.
[QUOTE=thisispain;31839232]how come when i say something on this forum i get rated dumbs and sent death threats about how wrong i am and then 5 months later people say the same thing and it's communally accepted.
is there like a calendar or a programme so i can stay on schedule?[/QUOTE]
story of my life on communities with elitism
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
