Dev branch Vs Live Branch - is there any FPS difference for you?

Hey guys. Could you try the live branch and the dev branch and let us know whether you experience any difference?

1 Like

Is this why there is a 200mb download on dev version?

You think?

Is it worth the time? Has anyone noticed massive fps increases?

I had no difference, checked it in 3 different spots inside and outside my house.

I cant start the game with Dev Branch anymore… 2 patchs today for it… my steam stop respondig… and i need to restart the pc

I would say the the fps on live an dev branch are a little bit laggy.But that is probably due to my laptop, since i don’t have a desktop to figure the fps problem.

The Dev branch FPS acts up once and a great while but the overall FPS is better in Dev Branch for me.

Live works better for me.

Dev Branch
FPS Looking at the ground: 20 - 25
FPS Looking around: 12 - 17

Normal Branch
FPS Looking at the ground: 23
FPS Looking around: 17 - 19

(Taken on 15th December)

Computer Stuff
Operating System: Windows 7 Ultimate (64-Bit)
Processor: Intel Core i5-2500 CPU @ 3.30 GHz (4 Cores)
RAM: 12 Gig
DirectX Version: 11
Graphics Card: Nvidia GeForce GT 520
Screen Resolution in game: 1024 x 768, Windowed, Fastest Textures, Grass Off

Hope this helps?

EDIT: Screw you guys rating me funny for my crappy FPS/hardware :frowning:

Seems to be the same 20-ish fps since the update running on Mac Os x 10.8.5.

Dev Branch
FPS Looking at the ground: 40 - 50
FPS Looking around: 30 - 40

Normal Branch
FPS Looking at the ground: 60
FPS Looking around: 50 - 55

(Taken on 15th December)

Computer Stuff
Operating System: Windows 7 Pro (64-Bit)
Processor: AMD FX 6300 @3.5Ghz (6 Cores)
RAM: 12 Gig
DirectX Version: 11
Graphics Card: Radeon HD 6770
Screen Resolution in game: 1600x900 Fantastic Settings, grass.on false.

Benchmarks with Fraps benchmarks during 120sec

run home A to home B and looking around with some animals

Dev Branch
Time: 120000ms - Avg: 106.650 - Min: 59 - Max: 141

Normal Branch
Time: 120000ms - Avg: 111.167 - Min: 58 - Max: 184

without fraps benchmarks activated for the same way to go home A to home B never go under 90 fps dont see difference betwin dev and normal branch

(Taken on 15th December)

Computer Stuff
Operating System: Windows 7 Ultimate (64-Bit)
Processor: Intel Core i5-3570K CPU @ 4.2 GHz
RAM: 8 Gig
Graphics Card: Nvidia GeForce GTX 770
Screen Resolution in game: 1680 x 1050, Full texture, grass.on false

Wow, this game must be next-gen or something.

Or you know, in development?

The game is unplayable dev branch, the ground is a crazy white and some plants flash like crazy. also alot of item sprites do not work, like from what i could tell the flares did not look like flares it was a black box for the icon

framerate is great with dev branch as was with normal branch.
no real difference for me

FX 8320 @ 4.4ghz, 24GB DDR3 1333mhz, GTX660TI, Arch Linux x86_64
1920x1080, fantastic

the mouse issue still there though (posted already on other thread):frowning:

On the Dev Branch the performance is 30-35% worse here.

AMD Phenom 2 X4 955 @ 3.2Ghz

HD 7770

8 GB RAM

Live version: 60-80 FPS
Dev version: 40-55 FPS

For me the Dev version is considered unplayable. I can’t be competitive under 55-60 FPS.

Being a PvPer is important to get smooth frames.

The one that was about maybe 2 weeks ago increased my fps by about 10-20 so that was good for this one there was no real increase in the FPS, it’s been the same for me for this update.